Dave Reynolds wrote in today's PJS that Geno's first rebuilding year was 2011-12. What would he call the years since?
Think he overrated their talent. Nothing is polluted. No matter who the coach is 20+loss seasons will drive the fans away, while 20+ win seasons will keep the 10,000 coming back. What are you doing on the computer this time of day, I know the courses are open. I'd be playing Arizona Golf Resort on Fridays if I was able to come back out there.
Don't get into trouble up there in the 312, AZ.
Where are you going out to dinner?
Depends, as always, on who's buying!
He wants to surprise me! Will report back later.
Too cold to get into any serious trouble. My privates are way
up in my stomach.;-);-);-)
Don't get into trouble up there in the 312, AZ.
Where are you going out to dinner?
I agree that talent was overrated, but then, IMO, a bigger mistake was not seeing it sooner, refusing to believe they were wrong about many things, and correcting the downslide, or getting assistants who were better at evaluation and recruiting.
But, this is just my opinion, I think this staff kept trying to make it work by having players play out-of-position, and run an offense that the players were not suited for, instead of adjusting the coaching to fit the talent.
I pretty much agree with your post but how do you adjust coaching to fit talent that can't throw a ball in the ocean standing in a boat. What can they do to change that?
Simple- better passing, better motion and cutting, creating better, higher percentage shots. And most of all, stop taking so many low-percentage shots we can't make!
Here is an amazing stat that you haven't seen the PJ Star point out-
Bradley is the worst 3-point shooting team in the MVC (31.6%), yet they have attempted an amazing 503 three pointers on the season! That is 18 three point attempts per game, more than any other MVC team except Indiana State and Wichita State.
Question- If Bradley is the worst 3-point shooting team, why do they take so many of them? If nearly every other MVC team seems capable of getting better, higher percentage shots, why can't Bradley? I propose it has something to do with coaching.
In fact, here is an interesting comparison-
Bradley has attempted almost 200 more three pointers on the season than Evansville (503 vs 318 )! Not surprisingly, Evansville has the highest overall shooting percentage in the MVC at 48.9%. In fact, Evansville is the 9th best team in shooting percentage in all of Division I.
On the other hand, Bradley is shooting a woefully bad 38.0% overall, which is 344th in D1. Clearly, Evansville's coach has them taking higher percentage shots, while Bradley's offense seems to be in love with the 3-pointer, despite the fact they are the worst at shooting them.
503 of Bradley's 1422 shots on the season have been 3-pointers (35.4% of Bradley's shots)! Yet Bradley has the worst 3-point shooting percentage! Is there something wrong with that picture?
But obviously, the better long-term solution is to recruit players who can shoot better. That is on the coaching staff. We've had 5 recruiting classes under this coach, so there are simply no acceptable excuses for being one of the worst shooting teams in the entire country year after year.
So if you were the coach, and you had the league's worst 3-point shooting team, you's have them launching threes for 35%+ of their shots? I doubt it.
A good coach maximizes the talents of his players, not maximize their weaknesses.
Simple- better passing, better motion and cutting, creating better, higher percentage shots. And most of all, stop taking so many low-percentage shots we can't make!
Here is an amazing stat that you haven't seen the PJ Star point out-
Bradley is the worst 3-point shooting team in the MVC (31.6%), yet they have attempted an amazing 503 three pointers on the season! That is 18 three point attempts per game, more than any other MVC team except Indiana State and Wichita State.
Question- If Bradley is the worst 3-point shooting team, why do they take so many of them?