Coach Wardle said:
"You can always go transfers and the junior-college route for a quick fix,”
Bradley coach Brian Wardle said. “You’re going to have one good year and
then you’re going to take a step another two or three years and then you’re
going to do it again.
I appreciate Coach Wardle's opinions about not focusing on junior college recruits, but I don't necessarily agree with this statement. If anything has been proven in the last year, it is that taking freshmen, especially late recruits, can be far more of a gamble, lead to "recruiting misses", and can set recruiting back.
Three of Coach Wardle's freshman recruits from last year left right after last season ended (Cooper, James, Okafor), resulting in the need to sign a bunch more late recruits. And it looks certain that another two, or more of last year's freshmen, and maybe some of this year's new recruits will likely leave after this season. So I don't see how the concern about having one or two jucos for 2 years can be any worse than the huge turnover we've already seen that sets the program back every year.
Plus, jucos are less concerned about playing for a winning program, and just want to play right away. They usually come in and produce right away, compared with the freshmen we've seen come and go, and who tie up scholarship slots for 1 or 2 years, and never develop and never produce significantly. Wouldn't a coach rather have to worry about replacing kids who help you win, rather than keep replacing "recruiting misses" every year or two?
And finally, the suggestion by Coach Wardle that the jucos help you for a year or two, then they set you back when they leave, and "then you’re
going to do it again"- doesn't make a lot of sense, as long as you are also recruiting good 4-year players to go along with the occasional juco.
Many of the most successful teams and coaches in college basketball do it. And the best teams in the MVC year after year bring in key jucos almost every year.
Wichita State lost 2 NBA players last year, but they are right back as the top team in the MVC because they brought in leading scorer Darral Willis, Jr., and starting point guard Daishon Smith from junior colleges. Missouri State has leapfrogged about half the teams in the MVC by relying on quality jucos. They have started as many as 4 jucos in some games, and their top 3 scorers and top rebounder are jucos. And Illinois State is competing for the league title after losing their top scorer last year (also a juco), and now 2 of their key players this season are new juco recruits. And SIU, Indiana State, UNI, and Loyola have all benefited from jucos on a regular basis.
I don't know why a coach would want to eliminate a major source of good quality players that help other midmajor programs be successful, while we remain in a continuous rebuilding mode.