In my opinion, the "seeding" of the CBI has been a farce. The "seeding" has been mostly determined by who is willing to pay the fee and host games, and somewhat by crowd enthusiasm. I haven't seen whether Tulsa or UVA is the supposed #1 "seed." Here is how I think it will play out. If Houston beats Tulsa I believe they will be the "lower seed" in the finals...the BU/UVA winner will be the "higher seed." If Tulsa beats Houston, it's tougher to say. UVA, BU, and TU can all make a case for hosting twice based on fan enthusiasm at the games so far.
If you did a true seeding based on RPI, it would be (1) Houston, (2) Tulsa, (3) BU, (4) UVA. Based on Sagarin, it would be (1) Houston, (2) Tulsa, (3) UVA, (4) BU. Either way, the top 2 are playing each other in the semis, as are the bottom 2. Based on play the last part of the season, Tulsa and BU would be the top 2 seeds. BU's arena is not available...thus they cannot be a 1 or 2 seed now.
Houston never wanted to host. Their fan support is not great and thus they wanted no part of the $60,000 fee. That is why I think they have at most 1 home game left. I'm looking out for my best interests and I want Tulsa and BU in the finals and Tulsa to be the higher seed. That means I may get to see BU twice here, and I will be rooting for them if and when that happens.