• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Thank God!!!

Only problem is Silva is making just as much the next two years and is a horrible pitcher. Great to see that guy finally gone though as he was also a HUGE clubhouse problem on top of not playing that well.

Now go make some moves Hendry!!!
 
I honestly am not excited about this. We are paying pretty much the same amount for a bad pitcher who is a question mark because of injuries. I understand that Bradley may have done so much damage that his relationship with the fans and the organization could not be repaired, but the Cubs go and get his hitting coach from the Rangers and we get rid of the guy for basically nothing in return. If the Cardinals get Holliday back, prepare for another year of no postseason.
 
Well, with the extra $9mil that Seattle is sending us, that means that when all the money is evened out, Carlos Silva will essentially cost the Cubs $9mil a year, while Milton Bradley will essentially cost the Mariners $13.5mil a year. So we are saving a bit of money.

On the other hand, chances are that Carlos Silva will be cut in Spring Training, so he will basically be paid around $25mil from both the Cubs and Mariners to NOT pitch for two years. I wish someone paid me a fraction of that to not play baseball.
 
Wow the Cubs got nothing in return and still need to spend some $$$. It looks like management is looking to save $$$ and not win. I'd have to think that if the Cubs were looking to win they could have traded MB for some prospects and eaten a few $$$s but with this trade it smells of pure cheapness. Seattle is a good place for MB because the press rarely heads out that far west and its a fairly mellow city.
 
SFP said:
Wow the Cubs got nothing in return and still need to spend some $$$. It looks like management is looking to save $$$ and not win. I'd have to think that if the Cubs were looking to win they could have traded MB for some prospects and eaten a few $$$s but with this trade it smells of pure cheapness. Seattle is a good place for MB because the press rarely heads out that far west and its a fairly mellow city.
Click to expand...

There was no way anyone was going to take Milton Bradley for prospects without us eating most, if not all of his contract. We're lucky to get what we did, which isn't much, but hopefully it frees up enough money this year to sign Matt Capps or Marlon Byrd, which I would take over prospects.
 
With no one really wanting milton bradley, it would appear this is the best you possibly could have hoped for. However, it is one bad player for an awful pitcher, freeing up a bit of payroll, but otherwise doing nothing to improve the team. Going to be interesting next season.
 
Trading Milton Bradley and getting anything more back than a bag of dirty towels is a huge success. If the Cubs can play up to their potential and win the NL pennant, this could go down as one of the best trades in Cubs history.


Of course, the signing of Bradley last year will rank up with the trade of Lou Brock as one of the worst Cubs moves of all time.
 
Da Coach said:
Trading Milton Bradley and getting anything more back than a bag of dirty towels is a huge success. If the Cubs can play up to their potential and win the NL pennant, this could go down as one of the best trades in Cubs history.


Of course, the signing of Bradley last year will rank up with the trade of Lou Brock as one of the worst Cubs moves of all time.
Click to expand...

Very much agree DC!!!
 
I actually think Silva could be a valuable middle relief guy for the Cubs next year, and maybe a starter. He still has good stuff, but mysteriously couldn't get many people out the last couple seasons since going to Seattle. He is Venezuelan, and about the same age as Carlos Zambrano (also Venezuelan), so I think it's likely they know each other well. Maybe his presence on the team could be a benefit to Big Z?

On the other side of this trade, what is the chance that Milton Bradley puts up an All-Star season next year at Seattle while the Cubs are hurting for a consistent hitting outfielder?

Carlos Silva's stats-
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/silvaca01.shtml

Milton Bradley's stats-
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/bradlmi01.shtml
 
Considering Silva has declined since 2005 in every category, including having an abysmal 8.60 ERA last year, giving him around a 7.00 ERA for the last 2 years, I really don't think he's going to be a valuable asset. Not to mention the fact that he was pitching at Safeco, which may be the most pitcher-friendly ballpark behind Petco.
 
There's still one move to be made folks. The Cubs will acquire a Centerfielder before Spring Training, I'm sure. Lets hope it's not Scotty Pods. ugh. Problem is, that everyone wants the Cubs best prospects (Vitters and Castro) whom the Cubs are reluctant to give up. Anyway, a speedy centerfielder would allow the Cubs to move the incredibly mediocre Fukudome to Right which is his natural position.
 
BU_EMT128 said:
With no one really wanting milton bradley, it would appear this is the best you possibly could have hoped for. However, it is one bad player for an awful pitcher, freeing up a bit of payroll, but otherwise doing nothing to improve the team. Going to be interesting next season.
Click to expand...

says the avid Cards fan....actually claiming the season to be "interesting" not immediately crowing the Cardinals as NL champs :)

Da Coach said:
Trading Milton Bradley and getting anything more back than a bag of dirty towels is a huge success. If the Cubs can play up to their potential and win the NL pennant, this could go down as one of the best trades in Cubs history.

Of course, the signing of Bradley last year will rank up with the trade of Lou Brock as one of the worst Cubs moves of all time.
Click to expand...

Well said....well said...don't know about that whole NL pennant thing though. Having built up expectations every year before this...i'm going w/ low expectations hoping that the cubs doing ANYTHING good will be well above my expectations :p

Big Mike said:
Very good news IMO......if bradley stayed on the Cubs roster by opening day I vowed to quit watching....its was a bad move to sign him from day one.....now go out and sign Byrd and Capps with the 13 or so million increase in ticket prices this season and give us some hope!

Cubs.com.....
http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/ar...t_id=7828862&vkey=news_chc&fext=.jsp&c_id=chc
Click to expand...

Not necessarily bad move on day one. Ignoring Bradley's insanity...on paper, he is what the cubs needed. A switch hitting outfielder that could technically hit from the left and would make pitchers work to get him out/draw a walk.


Overall, I'm happy because cubs got $ and got rid of a poison in the locker room. The longer he was there the worse the team would be. Send Silva to the bullpen and put him in Mid-relief. Keep him out of the dugout and away from other head cases (Big-Z). Would like to see a CF come in or develop someone. Either way is fine w/ me. don't look terrible next year.

1. Cards
2. Cubs
3. Astros (don't sleep on these guys...always a tough win for teams)
4. Brewers
5. Pirates
6. Reds (silly dusty baker)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top