• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

UNI Rumor

BradleyBrave said:
I agree on winning and not cheating.

Regardless of the player, I would follow university athletic policy, which UNI has done here.
Click to expand...

Yeah agreed. Although I checked and saw that Brady Morningstar missed 9 games! I don't know if all of those were from his DUI or what....does that mean Kansas is strict...or maybe because he isn't a vital member of the team anymore haha.
 
Future Walk-On said:
I myself would give our star player a few extra chances before I ruined the teams chances at succeeding...
Click to expand...

Why should it matter at all who the player is? If you get a DUI, then you should pay the price no matter what your stats are. The two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
 
shaunguth said:
Why should it matter at all who the player is? If you get a DUI, then you should pay the price no matter what your stats are. The two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
Click to expand...

Oh I wasn't refering to a DUI. It was my assumption that a DUI would be grounds for suspension for the rest of the year. If I get a DUI I can not get certified to teach in this state!

I mean I would work with a trouble maker and try to fix him (things like TB's problems) before I was done with him. I feel like the program would still be clean and we would win. I guess that is like what les is doing....wonder what he will do if something else happens?

oh and as far as about the player...(that is just my opinion :(, i am not a head coach...but I may like winning to much)
 
for instance. how many games do you think sheron collins would have been suspended if he got a DUI? do you think it would have been 9 like morningstar? or less...just curious i have no idea
 
Future Walk-On said:
Oh I wasn't refering to a DUI. It was my assumption that a DUI would be grounds for suspension for the rest of the year. If I get a DUI I can not get certified to teach in this state!

I mean I would work with a trouble maker and try to fix him (things like TB's problems) before I was done with him. I feel like the program would still be clean and we would win. I guess that is like what les is doing....wonder what he will do if something else happens?

oh and as far as about the player...(that is just my opinion :(, i am not a head coach...but I may like winning to much)
Click to expand...

That's what I'm talking about. I feel like a DUI should be grounds for suspension of at least 50% of that season's games and continued into the next season if need be.

I agree that any troubled kid should be "worked with". I believe in 2nd and sometimes 3rd chances, but not without consequences pertaining to the violation(s).
 
Future Walk-On said:
for instance. how many games do you think sheron collins would have been suspended if he got a DUI? do you think it would have been 9 like morningstar? or less...just curious i have no idea
Click to expand...

I have no idea either, but would certainly hope it's the same punishment for any student athlete that violates the same rule/law.
 
Future Walk-On said:
Yeah agreed. Although I checked and saw that Brady Morningstar missed 9 games! I don't know if all of those were from his DUI or what....does that mean Kansas is strict...or maybe because he isn't a vital member of the team anymore haha.
Click to expand...

Just for the record, the Morningstar issue was a second violation of team conduct rules.

Not second DUI, but second issue.
 
There have been a couple schools in the Valley where players had DUIs & other underage alcohol violations and received absolutely NO visible penalties despite talk of discipline...
At both schools the violations were kept 100% secret until the message boards and (in one of the two cases) the newspaper outted them....even then the coaches were deceptive with the facts....
Then, all we heard were the same old haggard lines --
"we're going to wait until the system plays itself out",
"we're going to wait until we have all the facts",
"we're going to impose an immediate and complete suspension", etc...
followed by....the kid the very next day being filmed in practice and then starting and playing the next game despite the claim of discipline...or simply showing up as a starter in the next game...

Those two schools have since had ton and tons of repeated discipline issues, with one of the players I am referring to getting arrested again and again, then finally getting dismissed!!
So it's pretty clear the weak or non-existent discipline is as bad as shooting themselves in the foot...

So, as I have said before...my issue is NOT with the kids who violate the rules, it is with the schools & coaches who only talk discipline but never actually follow through or keep their word on discipline....
but then they end up paying the price themselves, as the violators learn they can get away with this stuff and never change, or half their team has court dates at any point in time, and arrest warrants are out for some of their guys!
 
Braves4Life said:
From what I understand UNI was simply following their written rules for student-athlete infractions. The word is that you get a suspension equal to 10% of your games for a first infraction.

Doesn't BU now have something similar?
Click to expand...

BradleyBrave said:
FWIW, BU's DUI policy enacted in 2008 is virtually identical to UNI's - 10% of the season on a 1st offense.
Click to expand...

Thanks for answering my question BB. :) That's what I thought.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top