http://torrentfreak.com/us-resume-file-sharing-domain-seizures-110201/
Apparently this answers the question of what happened to it.
Apparently this answers the question of what happened to it.
http://torrentfreak.com/us-resume-file-sharing-domain-seizures-110201/
Apparently this answers the question of what happened to it.
I like to watch other games, particularly NFL and college basketball, that aren't on locally on channelsurfing, I don't like this one bit. I don't want to have to pay for them, cause I wouldn't be able to.
I was at the game, so I had no clue that any of this went down.But to play devil's advocate here, you can still follow Bradley hoops if you:
A. Pay the BU.tv subscription (it was free today). This is notwithstanding the complaints folks have had, but it is legal.
B. If you live in Peoria, can watch the games on WTVP. And if you have cable, can watch them when they appear on MVC-TV/ESPN/CBS (if they one day make it that far)
C. Listen to the radio stream online. Sure you can't see the plays, but Snell does a nice job of describing the action on the court.
Just sayin'
Considering the site was pretty much illegal, I thought it was inevitable.
I envision ESPN will eventually grow large enough via ESPN3.com to take on all of this though.
In the article, it is stated that it was NOT illegal, it was simply a collection of links (local streams available to the public, from servers in another country, etc.) that the site provided. Channelsurfing did nothing wrong, they should have gotten the streamers. "Don't shoot the messenger"
Then if they target the streamers, there would be no channelsurfing.net. They were accessories to theft.
First part agreed, but the people that were streaming weren't really "thieves" as the servers were located in countries where the channels were free to stream. But eh, it's a legal debate that could go on for days. Hopefully they'll go live again soon. They were trying to get another domain (posted via twitter). AND they tread on some country's toes, I just can't get over how *****ic my country acted....Claims of "Homeland Security Threats". HOW are sporting events a threat to "Homeland Security" other than by hacking? *Sigh
Hmm,
Can someone help me out with this? Even if the sporting events were streamed off of servers in another country, wouldn't the copyright laws from the country where the sporting events take place take precedent over it being streamed in a different country? That is, if an NBA game is on a server in a foreign country where the copyright laws are different, wouldn't it still be illegal because the NBA is copyrighted in the U.S. and those copyright laws supersede those of the host country of the servers hosting the games?![]()
The company that administers the domain is in the US, but the rest of it is Spanish. So its really a pretty big stretch to snatch up the site. The most disconcerting part is simply the lack of due process in my opinion. If its illegal, its illegal - but shutting down the site without having proved its illegal isn't right. Getting rid huge chunks of that whole department (Homeland security) is a nice way to cut into those budget issues of ours heh. Justice department is probably a keeper.