• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

UNI Post Game Thoughts

BUBraves2006

New member
Discuss amongst yourselves ...

Anyone a little worried we gave our last scholarship to another guard, after that one?

Perfect example of why most teams can't play 4 guards...but I'm not jumping off the ship, this team is still going to win a lot of games.
 
road

road

:( Why can't we figure out how to have a decent first half on the road? We just keep digging big holes!! What is up with Zach? He has to give us more on both ends of the floor!!
 
The poor first half aside, I thought we played very well to get back in the game. Every time we got within 4-6 points down though, we lost our composure (bad shots, turnovers). On top of that, our free throw shooting wasn't very good until the game was out of reach. UNI came up with big shots in the second half to counter our comeback, and unfortunately, Bradley very seldom responded with a good play when they desperately needed it to keep the pressure on them. I really thought we had them on the ropes at the 10:00 mark, but they caught their second wind and came out on top. A better first half on our part wouldn't have put us in the position we were in in the first place.
 
Re: road

Re: road

Toyota12 said:
:( Why can't we figure out how to have a decent first half on the road? We just keep digging big holes!! What is up with Zach? He has to give us more on both ends of the floor!!

Zach is an great athlete and not a great basketball player and it shows with his inconsitency. Great athletes have some spectacular moments but dissappear at other times.
 
I know this much.......we cannot play all the Valley games with only 7 players.......too many minutes! :idea:
 
Big Mike said:
I know this much.......we cannot play all the Valley games with only 7 players.......too many minutes! :idea:
I would have liked to see AW out there. Bad week of practice or did Les just want him to see his first Valley road game before he threw him out there?
 
I know ZA had a bad game, but Salley killed us out there on both sides of the ball. Sometimes it seems like he just shut's his mind off during the game. One instance in particular in the second half we had climbed within 4-5 after being down 10+ points most the game. MS grabs a rebound, and instead of kicking it back out to set up a play he tries a spinning 7-footer into a double-team. It gets blocked, back the other way UNI hits a 3 and all the sudden we're down 8 again... Also, we need to play like men down low. period.

I'm very frustrated right now, that was a winnable game.
 
comeback

comeback

At this point in the season we do not need any moral victories down 14 and comeback to within 6.. I do not want to make anyone mad,we still got beat by 11..IMO we played terrible in the first half defensively and offensively.. The defensive pressure to open up the second half was key to the comeback,but we just could not get over the hump late...Why?
 
Re: comeback

Re: comeback

Toyota12 said:
At this point in the season we do not need any moral victories down 14 and comeback to within 6.. I do not want to make anyone mad,we still got beat by 11..IMO we played terrible in the first half defensively and offensively.. The defensive pressure to open up the second half was key to the comeback,but we just could not get over the hump late...Why?

What ended that run was poor FT shooting. That killed us. At one point at the end of the run we were 2-5 with one being a front-end of a 1-1. Had they made the FTs it would have been a different game.
 
It's early, and road games are going to be tough. As long as this isn't a trend, I'm not worried.

I am worried, however, that everybody will just beat us up inside all year long.
 
TheAsianSensation said:
It's early, and road games are going to be tough. As long as this isn't a trend, I'm not worried.

I am worried, however, that everybody will just beat us up inside all year long.

You should not worry that everyone is going to beat us up inside. Why, because that is just the way it will be this year so there is no sense in worrying about it. What I would worry about instead is bad defense and poor FT shooting. These things can be controlled and are what lost the game tonight.
 
I dont think i'm even going to bother watching the game, i walk in the door and start looking for the tape, my mom goes its over there but you're not gonna like it anyway. :twisted: thanks a lot :evil:.

I dont think we get beat up like this again inside. It was a horrible game for both ZA and MS, and against the best 1-2 forward combo in the league. If we can get just a lil consistency from our 2 guys, the situation wont be as bad. The MVC is still a gaurd dominated league.
 
georgethedog said:
TheAsianSensation said:
It's early, and road games are going to be tough. As long as this isn't a trend, I'm not worried.

I am worried, however, that everybody will just beat us up inside all year long.

You should not worry that everyone is going to beat us up inside. Why, because that is just the way it will be this year so there is no sense in worrying about it. What I would worry about instead is bad defense and poor FT shooting. These things can be controlled and are what lost the game tonight.

Yes, the road wins will be few and far between for all but the very elite teams in the Valley. I am a little miffed about why we played so badly on the defensive side in the first half. Don't know if it was coaching or more likely players a bit nervous playing their first Valley road game of the season. Probably the latter, but the second half shows we will be competitive in most of our road games. Hopefully we win a few since moral victories only go so far.

Also, they say this team will live by the three and die by the three. Well, not in every case. We had very good three point shooting tonight and we still lost. The way this team is structured, the three's will have to go down, BUT we have to play good defense as well. Defense creates offense, and UNI just exploited that aspect of their game quite well tonight!

We will win some road games this year. I'm just trying to figure where those few wins will occur! :D
 
Fetz86 said:
I dont think we get beat up like this again inside. It was a horrible game for both ZA and MS, and against the best 1-2 forward combo in the league. If we can get just a lil consistency from our 2 guys, the situation wont be as bad. The MVC is still a gaurd dominated league.


Yes, this is a guard dominated league, but if our bigs continue to get like they did tonight, it will allow teams to worry about stopping our guard penetration. Such was the case in the first half of the game tonight.
 
Re: UNI Post Game Thoughts

BUBraves2006 said:
Discuss amongst yourselves ...

Anyone a little worried we gave our last scholarship to another guard, after that one?

Perfect example of why most teams can't play 4 guards...but I'm not jumping off the ship, this team is still going to win a lot of games.

The problem is not the 4 guards its the size and abilty of the guards. JJ gives his all but in order to have an effective 4 guard offence he needs to be able to score and score allot against another teams power foward. Tonight for example he could not really take advantage of Coleman guarding him. At worst he should have been able to draw and kick to others.

The other factor is the size of the guards. JJ is 6'3 imagine a 6'6 Ray Brown in that spot or a 6'5 DW next year. Will is 6'0 (maybe) and he is a warrior who rebounds very well from his spot but put a 6'4 Jeremy Fears and it makes a difference. Im not sure why Andrew Warren didnt get any minutes, I think he more then JJ or DA could have scored on Coleman and made him pay for guarding him. Im not ready to give up on this system and Im happy with our recruits. UNI has one of the best forward tandems in the Valley most teams dont have two front court players that good and big.
 
Good to see the Braves get some national face-time on ESPN2, but not so great to see announcer Doug Gottlieb spin the Valley as a lower level conference.

Gottlieb belittled UNI's Brooks McKowen, made fun of the Panthers haircuts, talked about how none of the UNI players could even start on the U of Iowa team, and he constantly pushed the midmajor branding label on the Valley.

He said there is NO shame in being midmajor. Well, if there is no shame, then why is that label being applied? Gottlieb said it was all a matter of funding. The BCS schools just have more funds. Well, then if that's the case, then someone should be ashamed. It should be the well-funded BCS schools. With all their money, how could they lose on a fairly consistent basis to MVC schools. His arguement is a joke.

What matters is how sucessful a conference's teams are on the b-ball court. And Valley schools are VERY sucessful and have proven that by having a winning record against those well-funded power schools. MVC schools are sucessful on a national basis and that should carry alot more weight in determining whether it's TOP level college b-ball. It shouldn't be about how much money is thrown into a program.

Jesus, why are even MEDIOCRE BCS schools considered top flight, when non-BCS programs (that are clearly better overall) considered to be second string? Because those mediocre BCS schools are well funded? That's an announcer who's spinning (to a national TV audience) absolute BS! :evil:

Once again great to have the national TV exposure, but most uninformed b-ball fans that tuned in tonight's BU/UNI tilt will probably buy into Gottlieb's constant assertions that the Valley is a lower brand of basketball. Pretty damn sad. :(
 
Back
Top