• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

NCAA releases 2007 attendance figures

Da Coach

Da Coach

Moderator
Staff member
2007 NCAA attendance figures for Division I, II, and III schools--
http://www.ncaa.org/stats/m_basketball/attendance/2007_basketball_attend.pdf

2007 NCAA DIVISION I MEN'S BASKETBALL CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE--
Rank-School--Attendance Average
1. Big Ten 12,760
2. Southeastern 11,972
3. Big East 11,164
4. Atlantic Coast 11,118
5. Big 12 10,719
6. Pacific 8,524
7. Mountain West 8,298
8. Missouri Valley 8,020
9. Western Athletic 6,630
10. Atlantic 5,424
11. Conference USA 5,053
12. Colonial 3,701
13. Horizon 3,690
14. Mid-American 3,145
15. West Coast 2,690
16. Big Sky 2,541
17. Mid-Continent 2,530
18. Ohio Valley 2,432
19. Sun Belt 2,399
20. Metro Atlantic 2,394
21. Southern 2,370
22. America East 2,013
23. Atlantic Sun 2,013
24. Ivy 1,930
25. Big West 1,851
26. Patriot 1,846
27. Mid-Eastern 1,774
28. Big South 1,731
29. Southland 1,617
30. Southwestern 1,462
31. Northeast 1,206

#8 for the MVC is pretty good considering there are no major population centers among the member schools.

Bradley was #53 with an average of 9,728 per game.
 
Great--
Bradley finishes ahead of St. Louis, West Virginia, DUKE,
Georgia Tech, Notre Dame, Clemson, and several dozen other
BCS schools, even ACC schools, and TOP schools that are the
ONLY show in a HUGE market (Cincinnati, Oregon, Providence,
SIU, Washington State, Stanford, St. John's, Boston College, Gonzaga, etc.)
 
tornado said:
Great--
Bradley finishes ahead of St. Louis, West Virginia, DUKE,
Georgia Tech, Notre Dame, Clemson, and several dozen other
BCS schools, even ACC schools, and TOP schools that are the
ONLY show in a HUGE market (Cincinnati, Oregon, Providence,
SIU, Washington State, Stanford, St. John's, Boston College, Gonzaga, etc.)
Click to expand...

Regarding Duke (and I'm very happy to be ahead, don't get me wrong)... but doesn't Cameron only seat like 9000?
 
tornado said:
Great--
Bradley finishes ahead of St. Louis, West Virginia, DUKE,
Georgia Tech, Notre Dame, Clemson, and several dozen other
BCS schools, even ACC schools, and TOP schools that are the
ONLY show in a HUGE market (Cincinnati, Oregon, Providence,
SIU, Washington State, Stanford, St. John's, Boston College, Gonzaga, etc.)
Click to expand...

Cincy has crosstown rival Xavier as well as competing with border fans of IU and Kentucky... plus many fans in the area for OSU and Lousville. (edit: need to add Miami-Oh, Dayton and Wright St nearby)
 
tornado said:
Great--
Bradley finishes ahead of St. Louis, West Virginia, DUKE,
Georgia Tech, Notre Dame, Clemson, and several dozen other
BCS schools, even ACC schools, and TOP schools that are the
ONLY show in a HUGE market (Cincinnati, Oregon, Providence,
SIU, Washington State, Stanford, St. John's, Boston College, Gonzaga, etc.)
Click to expand...

Maybe my definition of "HUGE market" is different from yours.

Eugene, Oregon......population approx 150,000
MacArthur Court seats 9,087

Pullman, Washington....population 27,030
their Arena seats over 12,000

Carbondale, Illinois.......population 25,000
SIU Arena seats 10,000 if you include infants and children under 10

Peoria, Illinois........population 112,000+ per their city website
Carver Arena seats approx 11,000

Taking nothing away from BU's attendance because it has been undoubtedly very strong. But to call Eugene, Oregon, Carbondale, Illinois and Pullman, Washington 'HUGE markets' is a stretch to say the least.
 
The town sizes are one factor but the student pop should be considered also. For Ex. Peoria is bigger than Champaign but Bradley is what 4 times smaller than U of I.
 
In regards to Duke, I think Cameron Indoor Stadium only seats like 6,000. I could be wrong and it may be 9,000 like stated above. Either way its smaller than the civic center.

Good for Bradley and the MVC though, we may be "smaller" but we've got pride.
 
bu fan 9 said:
You mean a MO type schedule.
Click to expand...

Assuming you are being negative towards Mo's scheduling, that to me is a little unfair.

He had the following on his schedule between his last season and 96-97:

Illinois
Michigan
Penn State
Villanova
USC
George Washington
Kansas State
Oregon St
Temple.

before that I can remember
Utah
Missouri
Georgia Tech
Mississippi
Alabama
St Louis
DePaul

Granted some of these games were in season tourneys but still there are some that were scheduled outside of the tourneys.
 
No, I meant a Stowell like schedule. Check the press guides and you will see Joe had some real patsies come to the Fieldhouse.
 
These stats would be a lot more meaningful if they showed the average attendance as a percentage of capacity as well. Doesn't seem like it'd be that much more work, I'm not going to go through and do it. It does make it look like Duke has poor attendance even though they sell out every game.
 
Roll with the Funches said:
These stats would be a lot more meaningful if they showed the average attendance as a percentage of capacity as well. Doesn't seem like it'd be that much more work, I'm not going to go through and do it. It does make it look like Duke has poor attendance even though they sell out every game.
Click to expand...

Just wondering what a study of that data is gonna prove.

Would the conclusion suggest some schools should have an arena small enough to sell out every game?

Would it mean more if Duke played in an arena that sat 25,000 but they only averaged 18,000 (72% capacity)?

Would it mean more if a team filled their 10,000 seat arena every game (100% capacity)?

Just curious - that's all. :wink:
 
MacabreMob said:
Roll with the Funches said:
These stats would be a lot more meaningful if they showed the average attendance as a percentage of capacity as well. Doesn't seem like it'd be that much more work, I'm not going to go through and do it. It does make it look like Duke has poor attendance even though they sell out every game.
Click to expand...

Just wondering what a study of that data is gonna prove.

Would the conclusion suggest some schools should have an arena small enough to sell out every game?

Would it mean more if Duke played in an arena that sat 25,000 but they only averaged 18,000 (72% capacity)?

Would it mean more if a team filled their 10,000 seat arena every game (100% capacity)?

Just curious - that's all. :wink:
Click to expand...




Once interesting conclusion a study like this might show is that college games were meant to be played ON CAMPUS! I hate when schools move their games off campus for more revenue. IMO, the worst thing BU ever did was move their games from The Fieldhouse (typed with reverence) to The Civic Center. The whole atmosphere of "the game" changed.

Oh well, I guess I'm nothing more than a dinosaur traditionalist :cry:
 
I can't agree. By moving to the Civic Center, Bradley has been abole to draw much better teams into Peoria, and the added revenues from ticket sales has boosted Bradley tremendously. Does anyone think Bradley would be able to charge the kind of ticket prices, and maintenance fees they have now if they still played in the Fieldhouse? It also would have cost Bradley enormous sums of money to keep the facility up to the standard of a Div I arena, and would still be facing the same dilemma that they are now-- it's outdated, antiquated, and dilapidated. And the ability to recruit top players and coaches would have been severly limited.

There would be very little difference between Bradley and Drake over the last 25 years if they had stayed at the Fieldhouse.
 
Da Coach said:
I can't agree. By moving to the Civic Center, Bradley has been abole to draw much better teams into Peoria, and the added revenues from ticket sales has boosted Bradley tremendously. Does anyone think Bradley would be able to charge the kind of ticket prices, and maintenance fees they have now if they still played in the Fieldhouse? It also would have cost Bradley enormous sums of money to keep the facility up to the standard of a Div I arena, and would still be facing the same dilemma that they are now-- it's outdated, antiquated, and dilapidated. And the ability to recruit top players and coaches would have been severly limited.

There would be very little difference between Bradley and Drake over the last 25 years if they had stayed at the Fieldhouse.
Click to expand...

I agree with DC, this is a problem facing all small private schools. Stay on campus with bad facilities or move to better facilities they can't afford to have on campus. While I wish BU played games on campus, there's just no way we could. To have an arena like Carver on campus would be impossible due to maintenance, it would never be booked (competing with Peoria CC), and sheer space requirements - theres no room for an 10,000+ seat stadium, let alone parking for it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top