I did not like the way the game ended but overall Auburn dominated most of the game and deserved the win. I was personally going for Oregon. I did hate that one run where Dyer appeared down but was not and more then likely cost Oregon a chance at OT.
The sad part is it will probably get stripped from Auburn a few years down the road when the actual Cam Newton story comes out.
The closest thing we will ever see to a playoff system is a +1 game. Until the culture in college football changes, which wont be any time soon unless the BCS breaks away from the NCAA and forms its own league, the bowl system isnt going anywhere.
No way anyone could watch those two teams and walk away knowing for a fact TCU could not compete let alone beat either team. Infact Boise State, Wisconsin, Stanford, Oklahoma to name a few could have beaten either of those two teams.
I did not like the way the game ended but overall Auburn dominated most of the game and deserved the win. I was personally going for Oregon. I did hate that one run where Dyer appeared down but was not and more then likely cost Oregon a chance at OT.
While I agree with you about some of your list, you can't include Stanford in your list. They had their shot at Oregon and lost 52-31.
While I agree with you about some of your list, you can't include Stanford in your list. They had their shot at Oregon and lost 52-31.
The thing I hated was the 2 personal foul penalties on Auburn that were after the play was over, those 2 players should have been ejected as one ripped the helmet off of an Oregon player and the other one kicked an Oregon player that was on the ground causing him to have to leave the game during the 1st half because he was bleeding from the face.
The bcs was formed so they could do things like this, keep most of the money for themselves, reason why they also like to keep all the mid-majors out of the big dance.I really put them in there because I think Stanford would be part of an 8 team playoff. But you are right they did get a crack at Oregon.
Regardless the whole BCS is to me a complete joke. Oregon and Auburn are best because some computer says so, ESPN says so, the Presidents of the BCS schools say so? Neither are the best because there still is an undefeated team who by the eyeball test is equal to if not better then both teams who played last night.
And just to bring it up... Boise loses one game and plays in early December but garbage like Vtech who Boise beat and even more garbage UCONN both play in a BCS game. None of this makes any sense to me. Then again I guess it would make complete sense if my pockets were being lined by this scam.
While I agree with you about some of your list, you can't include Stanford in your list. They had their shot at Oregon and lost 52-31.
Hey, its no skin off the NCAA's back, remember, they technically do not award a national championship in division 1-a football.