Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Next Year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Next Year

    I'm putting together my 09-10 MVC early season preview for next year. What is the consensus on who will be starters? Will Les go with the 4 wings and 1 post lineup as he did for most of the year?

  • #2
    depends on health and availability...my guesses........

    Three of these four....Maniscalco, McCain, Warren and Roberts at guard
    then....two of these guys...Singh, Egolf, and maybe Prosser or Taylor Brown...
    but as an option, he might go with four guards...SM, EM, AW, and CR, with Egolf.

    Comment


    • #3
      EM, SM, AW, TB... and then either SS or WE, depending on his knee.

      Oh boy, let the starting projections begin again!

      Comment


      • #4
        Betting line says:

        2-1 EM, SM, AW, TB, SS with WE as the starter towards the beginning of conference play.

        Next best odd will be CR instead of TB

        and a long shot either JP or MK stepping in at the 4 or 5.

        and the Mine That Bird odds insert AT at the 5.
        "Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
        ??” Thomas Jefferson
        sigpic

        Comment


        • #5
          Prosser is starting by the end of the year. Mark it down.

          Comment


          • #6
            This will not happen but I would like to see a starting five of...EM, AW, JP, TB, DD..........with SM and CR the first two off the bench. I would take TB off this list if WE is ready to play.

            Comment


            • #7
              SM, AW, CR, TB, WE. Dodie then EM off the bench for the guards, Singh at the beginning of the year for the bigs, and hopefully Prosser by the end of the year
              Return to Glory

              Comment


              • #8
                Em
                sm
                aw
                tb
                we
                Peoria Toyota Scion

                Comment


                • #9
                  Em, sm, aw, jp, we

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    EM, SM, DD, AW, and CR.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by BUFAN View Post
                      EM, SM, DD, AW, and CR.
                      I hope not. We'll get killed on the boards - CR can jump but, c'mon.


                      EM, SM, AW, TB, WE - so that means I agree w/ mrcoachdude

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Em, aw, cr, tb, we
                        My sports blog.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I'm thinking about the same as thefish7, except having SS instead of WE. EM,AW,CR,TB,SS with SM,DD,WE and JP coming off the bench, at least for the first 5 games or so.
                          " MAN UP "

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I really hope EM comes off the bench to sub in for SM at point. SM will be so much better at point for us without all the defensive pressure being on him. EM is not a scoring threat...he can be left completely open. SM cannot and it'll open it up for others. Get as many offensive threats out there as possible!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Why would defensive pressure on the point guard be reduced?
                              My sports blog.

                              Comment

                              Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X