That's the title of the article:
"Can UNI afford to be a Division I school for athletics?"
they've already dropped some sports recently and are under pressure from different sources that want to cut state funding..
".. UNI has provided its athletics program more than $56 million in taxpayer or
student subsidies over the past dozen years to cover what couldn't be raised
through ticket sales, conference contracts, alumni donations, student fees and
other sources."
So why should UNI be allowed to use those public-dollar sources for athletics
when UI and ISU have managed to wean themselves from it?
But critics say tax money and tuition should go to fund academics, not sports.
The issue came to a head in 2012, when UNI cut nearly one-fifth of its
academic programs.."
"Can UNI afford to be a Division I school for athletics?"
they've already dropped some sports recently and are under pressure from different sources that want to cut state funding..
".. UNI has provided its athletics program more than $56 million in taxpayer or
student subsidies over the past dozen years to cover what couldn't be raised
through ticket sales, conference contracts, alumni donations, student fees and
other sources."
So why should UNI be allowed to use those public-dollar sources for athletics
when UI and ISU have managed to wean themselves from it?
But critics say tax money and tuition should go to fund academics, not sports.
The issue came to a head in 2012, when UNI cut nearly one-fifth of its
academic programs.."
Comment