If this is your first visit, feel free to
check out the Frequently Asked Questions by clicking this
LINK.
You are welcome as a guest, but you will have to REGISTER
before you can post messages.
To register, click the link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions.
If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.
The "media" are truly the only people in the known universe who seem lay claim to "the media's right to get access" to these kids.
Can someone show me where this is detailed in the Constitution?
Does "freedom of the press" supercede an individual's rights?
Does anyone the media identifies to be a "public figure" no longer have any rights? I have even seen where media people will even set up telephoto equipment to peer through people's windows, to record what's going inside their house.
And remember the media rummaging through Henry Kissinger's garbage to see if they could find something of interest?
Then they wonder why people (like Kevin Love) don't want to talk to or appear in front of media people.
Then they wonder why people (like Kevin Love) don't want to talk to or appear in front of media people.
If you can show me where Kevin Love said he doesn't like to or appear in front of the media, be my guest.
Quote from the article:
"I got all mixed up because we got new class schedules," he said. "I made honor roll and I'm trying to do it again."
Love said the media attention doesn't wear on him.
"With UCLA and being a big man here, it just comes with the territory," he said. "I like all the media stuff. I embrace it and I enjoy it. I want to be a sportscaster."
Its nothin' I've just read a couple of your posts...
As for this thread - Iceman and T were merely commenting on how the media is a little out of control. Sure the kid is a story, he may even like the attention - but ya know what...he isn't at UCLA to answer the media's questions or have his picture taken. He is there to get an education.
The "media" are truly the only people in the known universe who seem lay claim to "the media's right to get access" to these kids.
Can someone show me where this is detailed in the Constitution?
Does "freedom of the press" supercede an individual's rights?
Does anyone the media identifies to be a "public figure" no longer have any rights? I have even seen where media people will even set up telephoto equipment to peer through people's windows, to record what's going inside their house.
And remember the media rummaging through Henry Kissinger's garbage to see if they could find something of interest?
Then they wonder why people (like Kevin Love) don't want to talk to or appear in front of media people.
This media wouldn't be related to the media demanding "big brother" not tap suspected terrorists phones - would it?
Its nothin' I've just read a couple of your posts...
As for this thread - Iceman and T were merely commenting on how the media is a little out of control. Sure the kid is a story, he may even like the attention - but ya know what...he isn't at UCLA to answer the media's questions or have his picture taken. He is there to get an education.
You must have lost that in the translation.
I get that Kevin Love isn't there to answer questions, but if he has a weekly media session that he doesn't attend, I can understand the media getting a little mad about it. They went out of their way to go to UCLA to talk to him and he doesn't show. What if someone makes a doctor or dentist appointment and doesn't show? They'd probably be a little peeved too.
Maybe college players shouldn't talk to the press so they can focus on school. Didn't JL do that a few years ago?
Excuse me but why should he be apologizing? He's in college. His #1 priority is not the media, its not even playing basketball. Its his schooling. Sure you get a free ride, but you're only expected to participate in practices and games in exchange for that.
His coach should tell whoever is complaining that he didn't show up that they will no longer be allowed at any press conferences. The media should be THANKFUL for whatever they can get.
The "media" are truly the only people in the known universe who seem lay claim to "the media's right to get access" to these kids.
Can someone show me where this is detailed in the Constitution?
Does "freedom of the press" supercede an individual's rights?
Does anyone the media identifies to be a "public figure" no longer have any rights? I have even seen where media people will even set up telephoto equipment to peer through people's windows, to record what's going inside their house.
And remember the media rummaging through Henry Kissinger's garbage to see if they could find something of interest?
Then they wonder why people (like Kevin Love) don't want to talk to or appear in front of media people.
Comment