Uhhh, I hate to burst your bubble regarding your theory of postseason home games squirrel, but if you look at this mock bracket you will see that every, and I do mean EVERY mid-major team got stuck with a road game in the first round.
Not saying that would necessarily happen this year, but if the CBI holds mid-majors in this "esteemed" regard, then I want no part of this tourney!
This "third" tournament is beginning to sound like the college football bowl system to me. There's no reason for more than a third of the teams in D-1 basketball to be playing in a post-season tournament (the 65 for the NCAA, the 32 (I think) for the NIT and another 32 (again, not positive) for the "CBI"), such as the bowl system does (over half of the 113 teams get to go to bowl game, which is ridiculous).
And what teams are going to make up this third tournament? Those that eked out a 15-14 record (or worse) and were at or below .500 in their respective conferences? Come on, no one wants to see that!
I wouldn't dismiss the CBI, especially if it can get some TV deals. I find it hard to believe that you guys who are against the CBI would be in favor of turning down a BCS team coming into Carver Arena if that was their offer. Plus, unlike the NIT which is now run by the NCAA, we would be able to consume 'beverages' at a CBI game.
It's sounding a little better now isn't it...hmmm....hmmm....Mr. Scholarship winner....hmmm.....hmmm....gambling is illegal at Bushwood sir and I never slice....D@MN!
I wouldn't dismiss the CBI, especially if it can get some TV deals. I find it hard to believe that you guys who are against the CBI would be in favor of turning down a BCS team coming into Carver Arena if that was their offer.
Plus, unlike the NIT which is now run by the NCAA, we would be able to consume 'beverages' at a CBI game.
I suppose that's possible, but I just don't see many people watching it at all, no matter who's playing. When you consider the CBI will be teams that were not only leftovers from the NCAA, but leftovers from the NIT, a tournament already lacking a whole lot of attention, I just don't see anybody taking it too seriously.
Thanks for remembering IlliBrave. It shows you really care.Alright, let me rephrase, I LIKE Louisville, I'm not a die hard like I am with Illinois and Bradley. I'm sure you all have teams that you like to see win, not necessarily favorite teams, but teams you like to see win. As I remember, MM LIKES Xavier.
The idea of the CIB does not really thrill me, but i do like the idea of a 3 game championship. I think it would be a sweet thing to watch especially if we could get 2 of those 3 at carver.
You guys realize the NIT bubble is getting rough, right?
Several of those BCS "16-13"-type teams missed the NIT last year. Plus an Akron team that was 26-7.
These aren't bad teams going to the CBI.
p.s. My prediction: The CBI stablizes next year, and the NIT conventiently drops their conference champion rule, allowing the CBS to gobble all the small majors up while the NIT takes the high majors.
NIT loses interest and dies.
Mob, why would the NCAA allow this to happen? --just really curious..![]()
Well I can see this point to a degree, but I think that the NCAA could have done this without buying out the NIT. Maybe I am missing something about this though?Because they want to expand the NCAA Tournament, and eventually split DI.
Well I can see this point to a degree, but I think that the NCAA could have done this without buying out the NIT. Maybe I am missing something about this though?
Well I can see this point to a degree, but I think that the NCAA could have done this without buying out the NIT. Maybe I am missing something about this though?