I love our team as much as anyone here. But, even I can step back and say that we had a chance to play three legitimate teams that would carry some weight (SF, Wash St, Santa Clara) and we only went 1-2 and didn't really look good in either of the losses. Do I think we have one of the 68 best teams in the country? Yeah, but I don't see literally anything we've done that would make an outsider think that we're actually much better than the very bottom of that tournament level team list.
I think the sad part is that the season can feel somewhat meaningless is if we go 18-2 in conference and will have zero chance still at an at large. Unless something drastically changes, I wonder if Arch Madness should change its format to make it even easier for the top team to win it. If you win the regular season in our conference and you have no shot at an at large, there's really a problem.
Bringing two different threads together - I mean, would you rather be someone like Hannah who can be an all conference player, win 25+ games and still not even make the tournament maybe? Or would you rather be Hickman who is just a bit part but is all but assured to be in the tournament? I personally would rather be a great contributor to a really good team (option 1) but I do wonder if over time if guys just see the MVC now as never getting multiple bids anymore after the Indiana State debacle last year and that holds them back from staying around.
None of this ruins my excitement for the season - I still am glued to every game and it shows that the players really care every game. But, this sort of thing crosses my mind way too much these days (the concept of the meaningless regular season).