• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Carver Arena

B

brocks

New member
They're debating over on Valleytalk who has the best/worst venues. Does anyone have any good Internet photos of Carver? I've never found a really good photo . . . the one on the BU site you can barely see anything . . . looks like there's no upper bowl.
 
How about this


peoria_carver2.jpg

http://www.worldstadiums.com/stadiu...ica/united_states/illinois/peoria_carver2.jpg
 
Yeah, I know they were really bashing Carver arena over at Valley Talk. Some had is the second worst place in the league! I mean come on!
 
Stryker said:
Yeah, I know they were really bashing Carver arena over at Valley Talk. Some had is the second worst place in the league! I mean come on!
Click to expand...

That's because it's so difficult for their teams to win there. 8)
 
Stryker said:
Yeah, I know they were really bashing Carver arena over at Valley Talk. Some had is the second worst place in the league! I mean come on!
Click to expand...

How is that possible? Just this year I saw games at Carver, Hulman Center (InSU), Redbird Arena, and whatever Drakes is named and I'll take Carver over those 3 easy. I have also been to EU's in the past and it's not as good either. I'll admit I've never been to CU's, UNI's, WSU's, or MSU's and it's been awhile since SIU, but seriously? 2nd worst? It's just not possible.
 
I liked the Fieldhouse also. But that was 25 years ago. If the Braves still played there we would still be playing a Joe Stowell schedule.
 
Sadly, they may not be far from the point. While Carver may not be on of the worst in the Valley, it could be much bigger and better for the Braves. Carver was designed in the 80s (without much thought for growth) and is fast becoming eclipsed by other arenas. While it has had a few minor upgrades, without a few major changes (capacity and other amenities), it will quickly become bested by others and fade into memory. I don't want to happen at Carver, what happened with Robertson. Everyone was so busy telling themselves that it was such a great place for Bradley to play that they lost the realization that it should have been replaced far sooner than it was. If Bradley truly wants to be considered among the higher mid-majors (or possible a future above that) they must begin to address this problem soon and at least have a facility capable of handling a 1st round NCAA event..
 
Seriously folks, Carver is the pits. The lower bowl seats were butchered by that Italian firm, the hallways are too narrow, and the restrooms I cannot even describe. Now as far as fans go it's a whole other ballgame.
 
What is the major difference between Carver and Clemson's Littlejohn Coliseum? They seem to be fairly similar and I have not heard anything bad about Littlejohn
 
I came to Bradley in 1986 because BU gave me nearly a full-ride scholarship. I came to BU sight unseen. When I arrived I thought it was okay . . . worth the scholarship. I CAME to Bradley that way. But I UNDERSTOOD Bradley the first time I walked into Carver Arena.

So I disagree a bit with some of you. That is a special place to me: a place where a school with 5000 students can draw 11000 screaming fans. So many afternoons or nights I spent there were electric.

I wish I had the photos, but I don't.
 
Personally...I love going to Carver. I always have a great time.

But objectively I can see that the place is multi-purpose...pushing the fans farther from the court than they should be. The first time I went to Redbird I was sitting in the upper deck and I was freaked out at the steep view...but I was right over the court....that's how a basketball stadium should be.

I can't rank all ten because I'm too biased for BU...but I can see where other people are coming from on this...are any other MVC gyms used for hockey? Is Omaha basketball only? Never been.
 
I can't agree with anyone who doesn't like Carver. For a city the size of Peoria, with a 5000 student body, who are finally starting to realize how much fun a night at the arena can be, win or lose, it's great. The state wasted money building the Redbird arena. For the crowds they get the old gym was plenty big enough.
 
I believe Bradley could sell out a larger arena one some games and the school and team could use the revenue. I also believe the problems they've had over the years with the slippery floor (on warmer more humid days) has made Carver one of the worst arenas in the valley. Unless they can correct this problem along with some others they will always be 2nd rate. As for the fans, I agree the Bradley fans are awesome but I believe they can be more so in a improved venue...
 
I have to agree that the slippery floor is a bad part of Carver. If we could get rid of the ice and the boxing matches, I mean hockey games, played somewhere else it would help.
 
I don't think Carver is too bad (except maybe for that wet floor), but I also don't think it's ideal. Ideally, I'd like a stadium that seats a bit more that would qualify it for NCAA events, which was purpose-built for basketball and which was closer to or actually on campus.
 
In addition to the lower bowl seats were butchered by that Italian firm, the hallways being too narrow, and the bad restrooms, I forgot about the foor and the ice. But do not confuse a bad facility with the atmosphere and the fans. Complete opposites.
 
I still say the new additions should have included an area for hockey only seating about 5,ooo that could be used for other things in the off season then gut and refigure the arena for basketball only.......i know BIG dreams.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top