OK - I will defend my opinion with facts whether the ISU people want to be honest and admit these are proven facts or not.
Jank's record for 5 seasons before Muller arrived was 104-64 & 48-42 in MVC -
and FOUR Top-3 finishes in his five years in the MVC!!!
Muller took over a program that was winning - & returning almost EVERYONE - he didn't come in to clean up or rebuild from a fired coach...
He inherited a team that had just won 21 games and returned all-conference caliber players such as Jackie Carmichael, Tyler Brown, John Wilkins, etc...
In fact FOUR of the five prior seasons, ISU had won over 20 games (21, 22, 24, & 25!!)
But in the 3 seasons under Muller - now, suddenly they are clearly mediocre and underperforming...
even with those All-conference guys - they went 8-10 in the Valley.
Muller's overall MVC record is 23-23 - and the MVC is considerably weaker now with Loyola subbing for Creighton!
Muller has also had more home losses..
Jank had just 3 home losses in 35 games the last year but Muller has had 12 already in just over 2 seasons here.
Then you have all the player arrests, discipline issues, drug problems, dismissals, the revolving door with numerous players - many his own recruits - getting booted at the end of each season!
There's been a fair amount of turmoil that's also evidence of part of his coaching ability he still has to hone.
So - if you ask me what I think - I believe Dan Muller is a bright guy and a good coach - but he's still learning and is where Jim Les was in year 2 or 3 and still has a long way to go to become a very good coach...
Man is there a lot to cover in there....but I will let this thread try and get back on topic.
Only thing I will say, is it's not fair to compare Jank's and muller's overall records. Both have very different scheduling philosophies.....