• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Final score: Bradley 80 Valparaiso 69

Attendance was a disappointing 5,038. I continue to believe the 6:00 pm start games are significantly hurting attendance. I know a bunch of people who skipped tonight's game because of the early start time, and there were a lot of no-shows among the season-ticket holders. Those people still get counted, but if they skipped the game, it certainly affected other ticket sales.

But it was a great game. The turnovers were pretty much the only other downside to tonight's game.
Bradley had 18 turnovers and 10 of them were recorded as steals by Valparaiso.
Valpo leads the MVC in steals, so some of the turnovers were because they have big athletic guards who play hard, and play the passing lanes well.
But at least half of those "steals" were gifts from Bradley because of bad cross-court passes.
And there were a couple turnovers that were due to bad calls. One was the traveling call on Danya Kingsby when he fell to the floor with a rebound under the basket in the 2nd half. The NCAA rule allows a player to fall to the floor, and it is not travelling. It only becomes travelling if he tries to move to improve his position. Coach Wardle was quite upset with that call by Gerry Pollard.
Here is the NCAA rule-
A player falling, lying or sitting on the floor: It is legal when a player falls and slides on the floor while holding the ball or, while lying or sitting on the floor, gains control of the ball. It is a violation if the player then rolls or attempts to stand up while holding the ball.

There was another travelling call on Ja'Shon Henry under the offensive basket when he slid his non-pivot foot. The official seemed to think he moved his pivot foot, but he clearly did not.

Some of the other encouraging stats-
Bradley outrebounded Valpo 40-27
Bradley had 17 assists on 27 baskets
Bradley had 38 points in the paint, Valpos 28
Bradley shot 52.9% overall (27-51) and 50% from three (6-12)
Bradley held Valparaiso to 39.1% overall (25-64) and 24.2% (8-33)
Bradley free throws were much better- 20-25 (80%)
Bradley lead the game for the final 38:23 (96% of the game)
 
This board seems to be swarming with DB fans but I for one have not missed his terrible shooting and lousy passes.
nomonoles

Through their first 20 games, DB has the second best assist to turnover ratio on the team, and he is by far the team leader in assists. I get the frustration - he drives and throws up circus shots far too often and he never gets the calls from the referees, so he'd be better off only doing that occasionally to keep them honest, and passing out most of the time. Also, his incredibly terrible shooting performances on the road this year have really hurt us.

That being said, when he's not in there, our offense seems to just stand around, so I think his real importance to the team is being the floor general. And honestly, offensively, he's been fine most of the year at home.

Here's a breakdown of the assists and turnovers through the first 20 games:

[TABLE="border: 0, cellpadding: 0, cellspacing: 0"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 65"]Player[/TD]
[TD="width: 65"]A's[/TD]
[TD="width: 65"]TO's[/TD]
[TD="width: 65"]A to TO's[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Brown[/TD]
[TD]97[/TD]
[TD]49[/TD]
[TD]1.980[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Childs[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]0.789[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kennell[/TD]
[TD]47[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]2.474[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Henry[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]31[/TD]
[TD]0.484[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kingsby[/TD]
[TD]50[/TD]
[TD]43[/TD]
[TD]1.163[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Bar[/TD]
[TD]28[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]0.718[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Tahvanainen[/TD]
[TD]20[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]0.952[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Gabriel[/TD]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]12[/TD]
[TD]0.750[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Boya[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]0.750[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Thomas[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]1.471[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Houpt[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]3.000[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
MVC Standings after 9 games
standings-1-29
 
The 6pm start is definitely a pain in the ass and I’m sure it’s directly correlated with the lower attendance. Wardle said it was nice being done at 830 and the players having extra time to get home and rest. I get it, but there’s just not enough time on these weekday games to get home from work, eat, and get to the game with out being in a rush. That being said, I’m still doing what I need to to get to the game!
 
I agree with BUBraves 33. These early starts have definitely hurt attendance this year. I know we discussed this earlier in the year and most of us agreed it wasn’t a good idea. Anyone on the board know who was responsible for this decision and do you think it will go back to the traditional 7:00 starts again next year?
 
I heard from an associate AD that it was a team decision involving staff members of the basketball program and approved by the AD. It was done to try to draw more families with younger kids. They have gotten a lot of feedback, and I suspect most of it is negative like we have seen here. But they do not intend to change anything for the remainder of this season. They will meet and discuss after the season and make a decision whether to ditch the plan or continue it next season.
 
I have had to give away my seats to 4 games this year due to the early start. I probably could have made 2 of those, but wrangling up the wife and kids and commuting there from Farmington would put me there late. Who wants to rush around when you can just handle your affairs and watch the games on ESPN+? Not complaining, but that’s the reality of it.
 
I would have like to seen the twin towers in there for a little bit. It gives the other teams more to prepare for and may affect their rhythm on both sides of the court. We played good ball, except for the turnovers. Now lets beat Loyola.

GO BU
 
I would have like to seen the twin towers in there for a little bit. It gives the other teams more to prepare for and may affect their rhythm on both sides of the court. We played good ball, except for the turnovers. Now lets beat Loyola.

GO BU

Good point. That really seemed to be effective in the Indiana St. game and was actually pretty fun to watch!
 
I thought this was a great team win, with everybody contributing. Koch had a great game, posting a double double.

But I've got a admit, I moan with frustration at Koch's soft hands. I don't know how many times last night he appeared to have the ball in his hands, only to have it ripped away by a Valpo player. I wish Koch had hands like Ja'Shon.
 
I feel like I groaned all night about Koch and then I look up and he's got a double double lol

Koch definitely creates a love/hate relationship with the fans and Classof77 couldn't have said it better about the soft hands.

Still got to love the guy, as he's probably the nicest guy on the team, and you can't deny his effort! No question as to whether he cares or not, and I'm glad we've got him.
 
I feel like I groaned all night about Koch and then I look up and he's got a double double lol

My goodness - my feelings/thoughts exactly! May have been the most ho-hum double-double I've ever seen! I thought Koch has had way better games (without posting a double-double) than this one.

GOTTA cut down on the turnovers. That was the most frustrating thing from last night.
Ville and Ja'Shon are gonna be BIG parts to the Braves teams the next couple years after DB and NK move on.
I can see Ville setting the all-time Braves 3-point makes record, and I believe Ja'Shon is NBA material with a bit more development and PT.
 
Speaking of Ville. He is going to be a huge part of our program. Watching him during warmups he hit 14 out of 15 from beyond the 3 point line! Does anyone know anything about his ankle injury that took him out of the game for awhile? Trainers we’re working on him for awhile and he definitely was in a lot of pain. Came back in but didn’t seem to affect him to much.
 
Speaking of Ville. He is going to be a huge part of our program. Watching him during warmups he hit 14 out of 15 from beyond the 3 point line! Does anyone know anything about his ankle injury that took him out of the game for awhile? Trainers we’re working on him for awhile and he definitely was in a lot of pain. Came back in but didn’t seem to affect him to much.

I had a good look at what he was telling the trainer on the bench after he came out. It was not an ankle injury.
He was pointed to the back of his left calf, and the trainer was massaging the gastrocnemius (large posterior calf muscle).
He seemed to recover quickly and fully, so it must have been a simple muscle cramp. I think he'll be OK.

I really like Ville's game. He has a quick start to his dribble and is able to drive to the basket well. And his outside shot has been terrific since his 2-22 start. In the last 12 games, Ville is 20-38 (53%) from three and 40-67 (60%) overall. And his defense is improving. I think he will be a solid starter for the next 3 years, if he stays healthy.
 
Thanks Da Coach for clarifying. I also agree with you in that the future is bright for him. He plays with a lot of confidence for a freshmen!
 
The only part of his game that isn’t very impressive is his speed/quickness. And that should get better over the next few years. Accurate shooter, quick release, solid handles, confident driver, and comfortable finishing with either hand. Hasn’t shown much of a midrange pull up game or any floaters, but he’s more than just a shooter. He’s not great on d, but he’s not bad either. Add some quickness and strength and he could be really good there. I was stoked watching his videos after he committed and got concerned when he got off to his slow start. He’s been so good in conference play and I am looking forward to see how good he’s gonna be the next few years.
 
Back
Top