• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

I dont blame the coaching

Something else to think about. The coaches do not read this stuff, but players and most importantly potential recruits read boards from everywhere. Negativity would then hurt recruiting. The recruit says, “Why would I want to go there.” Your negative posts then carries weight to hurt the program as a whole.
 
Last edited:
Air Petey said:
Let's look at the facts:

A. This is a young team.
B. This team capable of being a really good team.

In our past 3-4 games we should have won - Nobody (other than SM) wants the ball! You can tell the kids everyday we need leaders who want the ball - BUT that can't be coached. I truely believe next year, we will have 3 or 4 guys that not only want the ball, they will make it in crunch time. Young teams need years like this to learn and get better. JL is not the problem.

PS - I'm not a BSS member. I have not spent tons of money. My problem is the people that spend "0" money but complain like they are somebody in the program.
Click to expand...

This is a young team? Sorry...that is not a "fact".

Maniscalco...Junior...3rd year in the program.
Roberts...Senior...2nd year in the program.
Warren...Junior...4th year in the program.
Brown...sophomore...2nd year in the program.
Egolf...sophomore...3rd year in the program.
DSE...freshman...1st year in the program.
Singh...senior...6th year in the program.

That's our 7 man rotation...5 of the 7 are either seniors or have been in the program for 3 or more years now...we are not 'young'...not by any stretch.
 
Air Petey said:
PS - I'm not a BSS member. I have not spent tons of money. My problem is the people that spend "0" money but complain like they are somebody in the program.
Click to expand...

I can pretty well guarantee that 90% of those who come on here have spent a vast amount of time on this program.


I'm sorry, but I'm not going to get into a virtual pissing contest about how much money I have donated or how long I have had season tickets...both are large and long...but thats besides the point...


The point most are getting at is that changes are necessary for the majority to be proud of the direction of the program...

Regardless of whether you spend $500 or $5000 on the program, it will not change your view of wins and losses.


Besides, who are you to say how much time and effort others have invested in the program? How in the heck would you know?!



Voicing opinion is fine, but you may want to spend less time assuming you know things like they are fact, and placing people on the chopping block that have no reason to be there when you simply have no earthly idea what you're talking about.


That is all....
 
I think worst case scenario, the wheels come off after the latest home embarassment and Jim ends up gone after the season.

Best case is that they wipe out the staff, like some have compared to Lovie Smith/Ron Zook. This could be really good or really ugly.

If Jim is willing to hire coaches that he will allow to change things, I think it could be a very successful move.

If Jim takes the Lovie approach and says "well we are changing coaches but they are going to think like I think and they are going to do what I say", I think it is setting up for disaster. Not only are you not changing anything, but who wants to come into a situation for a 1 year shot at the same ol' same ol' especially if the writing is on the wall.
 
As everyone knows, I've been a major proponent of pointing out the various mistakes Les has and my complete dislike for his coaching style and both his offensive and defensive systems he has in place...

That being said, I am all for giving him another year to turn it around IF he were to scrap the entire coaching staff and bring in some coaches that can coach better inside/out offensive sets, allow our team to play more zone, establish development of the bigs inside, AND most of all, coaches that can help Jim in game that he will trust to let take a little weight off his shoulders...

As far as I can tell, he does way too much with the assistants doing little in games, so that would be a huge plus.


Also, an assistant w/ some Chicago ties would be nice.
 
Air Petey said:
Let's look at the facts:

A. This is a young team.
B. This team capable of being a really good team.

In our past 3-4 games we should have won - Nobody (other than SM) wants the ball! You can tell the kids everyday we need leaders who want the ball - BUT that can't be coached. I truely believe next year, we will have 3 or 4 guys that not only want the ball, they will make it in crunch time. Young teams need years like this to learn and get better. JL is not the problem.

PS - I'm not a BSS member. I have not spent tons of money. My problem is the people that spend "0" money but complain like they are somebody in the program.
Click to expand...

Air Petey, WOW!!The truth is somewhere in-between!
The team is not all that young, juniors, seniors starting in 3 positions, a redshirt sophmore. I would say pretty average as age goes.
Capable of being a really good team? I don't know-I don't think so until they have a big man in the center.
Nobody else wants the ball-I do not agree-in fact a lot of posters have accurately noted a bit of competition between Warren and Brown in terms of wanting to score-3 players in the tops in MVC in scoring...nobody wants the ball????????
JL is not the problem-he is at the very least a part of the problem..
A good team next year..only if they have a wide body at center.
 
Air Petey said:
Let's look at the facts:

A. This is a young team.
Click to expand...

Da Coach did a wonderful job of figuring out returning scoring in this thread here:

http://www.bradleyfans.com/vb/showthread.php?t=13185&highlight=returning+scoring


Da Coach said:
The amount of returning scoring is usually a factor that determines how well a team does.
Here are the numbers for the amount of returning scoring for each team in the MVC-

Bradley- last season- 67.1 ppg- returning 50.1 ppg- 74.7% (lost leading scorer)
Creighton- last season- 73.3 ppg- returning 50.7 ppg- 69.2% (lost leading scorer/POY)
Drake- last season 64.5 ppg- returning 30.9 ppg- 46.7% (lost 2nd & 3rd leading scorers)
Evansville- last season 67.1 ppg- returning 19.4 ppg- 28.9% (lost top 4 scorers)
IL State- last season 71.0 ppg- returning 36.4 ppg- 51.3% (lost leading scorer)
IN State- last season 63.1 ppg- returning 55.0 ppg- 87.2% (lost 2nd leading scorer)
MO State- last season 60.9 ppg- returning 35.8 ppg- 58.8% (lost leading scorer and 3 of top 4)
UNI- last season 67.4 ppg- returning 63.4 ppg- 92.4% (lost only 7th leading scorer)
So IL- last season 63.4 ppg- returning 36.5 ppg- 57.6% (lost 3rd & 4th leading scorers)
Wichita St- last season 62.9 ppg- returning 43.3 ppg- 68.8% (lost 4th & 5th leading scorers)

Additional notes-
Bradley also returns Andrew Warren who missed last season, but averaged 13.2 ppg in 2007-2008.
SIU adds Tony Freeman who lead Iowa in scoring in 2007-2008 with 13.8 ppg.
InSU might add Jake Kelly who lead Iowa in scoring in 2008-2009 with 11.6 ppg. No decision has been released by the NCAA on a waiver that could allow Kelly to play for Indiana State this season.
SIU's 3rd leading returning scorer, Ryan Hare, is suspended and charged with a felony. His return to the team is undetermined.

In order of highest to lowest returning scoring-
UNI..........92.4%
IN State...87.2%
Bradley.....74.7%
Creighton..69.2%
Wichita St.68.8%
MO State..58.8%
So IL........57.6%
IL State....51.3%
Drake.......46.7%
Evansville..28.9%
Click to expand...
 
tornado said:
I like you petey....PM me and I'd like to meet you at the next game ;)
Click to expand...

I like you Betty....

That's Danny sir...

caddyshack.jpg
 
ER3 said:
This is a young team? Sorry...that is not a "fact".

Maniscalco...Junior...3rd year in the program.
Roberts...Senior...2nd year in the program.
Warren...Junior...4th year in the program.
Brown...sophomore...2nd year in the program.
Egolf...sophomore...3rd year in the program.
DSE...freshman...1st year in the program.
Singh...senior...6th year in the program.

That's our 7 man rotation...5 of the 7 are either seniors or have been in the program for 3 or more years now...we are not 'young'...not by any stretch.
Click to expand...


I think by "young", the meaning was that the most important parts of the team will be back next year. And that is true. Only 2 seniors, Sam Singh and Chris Roberts, will be gone. Dodie Dunson, who had the capability to be the leader of this team, and possibly a leading scorer, will return healthy.

If we look at the % of retunring scoring for next season, Bradley will be at the top of the list.
 
JMM28 said:
I think worst case scenario, the wheels come off after the latest home embarassment and Jim ends up gone after the season.

Best case is that they wipe out the staff, like some have compared to Lovie Smith/Ron Zook. This could be really good or really ugly.

If Jim is willing to hire coaches that he will allow to change things, I think it could be a very successful move.

If Jim takes the Lovie approach and says "well we are changing coaches but they are going to think like I think and they are going to do what I say", I think it is setting up for disaster. Not only are you not changing anything, but who wants to come into a situation for a 1 year shot at the same ol' same ol' especially if the writing is on the wall.
Click to expand...

My question to those that think JL is not a good coach, seemingly based on his 8-year record and lack of quality recruits, is why do I get the sense that almost everyone is willing to give him another year? If he's indeed that bad of a coach and we aren't getting the recruits that we should be getting, then why isn't he gone as soon as the season ends?
 
Air Petey said:
Something else to think anout. The coaches do not read this stuff, but players and most importantly potential recruits read boards from everywhere. Negativity would then hurt recruiting. The recruit says, ???Why would I want to go there.??? Your negative posts then carries weight to hurt the program as a whole.
Click to expand...

If a recruit bases his choice of school on the message boards, then I don't want that player.
 
SaintLouBrave22 said:
Well, I think I'll be holding many to this quote then....


Basically put, no more excuses!
Click to expand...

We returned a lot of scoring this season too, but it doesn't help when your best returning 3-point shooter ends up playing a total of 45 minutes for the season.

Disclaimer: This is not an "excuse", but a fact.
 
funny...I saw where a bunch of know-nothings on a message board elsewhere just embarrassed themselves royally by making accusaitons that some guy there was me...
I have been on message boards for over a decade and it's a haggard old losing ad-hominem argument to try to paint others who disagree as simply being the same identity..especially if trying to support your own argument fails..
 
shaunguth said:
My question to those that think JL is not a good coach, seemingly based on his 8-year record and lack of quality recruits, is why do I get the sense that almost everyone is willing to give him another year? If he's indeed that bad of a coach and we aren't getting the recruits that we should be getting, then why isn't he gone as soon as the season ends?
Click to expand...

Because he's a Hall of Fame player, an alum, and I think most fans generally like him as a person.
 
BradleyBrave said:
Because he's a Hall of Fame player, an alum, and I think most fans generally like him as a person.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about the people that believe he should be gone. Why does it seem that most of those people are giving him another year? It's a serious question that I was curious to know the answer to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top