I am at work and don't have time to read the entire thread... But here are my thoughts...
Jim Les works well with a varied backround of talent and molds that into a gameplan that works. Jim Les certainly has basketball experience that Jank does not. However, IMO Jim Les attempts to micromanage a game, calling unnessecary timeout which stem momentum, and making gameplan switches away from something that works. I feel we often get outcoached at halftime when adjustments are made, and we use the first 3-4 minutes of the second half figuring out how to adjust to the other team.
On the other hand, I feel Jank was given talent in a handbasket so to speak. Jank did not recruit his most talented player, yet he continues to win. Jank has proven he can outcoach and outplay cupcakes; now schedule 2-3 top 25, including one top 10 team, and see how everything shakes out.
Right now, my vote goes to Les. Lets just figure out when we need to take a timeout to stop the bleeding, or forego a timeout to build momentum before i rip all my hair out and poison my liver.