• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

OT: He is coming...

A "King" does not relinquish his throne! Jordan allowed the Bulls to build around him with Pippen/Grant and later by adding Rodman/Harper, but by and large it was MJ who was the leader of the Bulls.

Magic was drafted by the Lakers, but left the game as the all time assist leader until Stockton broke that record. But even as a rookie almost had a triple double playing center against the Sixers in the NBA finals, something like 42 pts, 10 reb, 9 asst! Kareem may have been the all-time scoring leader, but Magic quickly established himself as the catalyst that made "Showtime" a feature in LA.

That being said, the Heat is Dwyane Wade's team. No If's, And's, or But's about it! If the clock is winding down and LeBron has the ball in his hands, I'm comfortable he'd pass the ball to another player to take the last shot. He's proven that he can get a triple double and be an all around player. If the clocks winding down and Wade has the ball in his hands.......He's Shootin'! Why? Because it's his team! He's the only guy out of the "little 3" with a ring!

At the end of the day, Lebron doesn't owe Cleveland anything. I can live with his decision of going to Miami because I've never seen him as being the best player in the game. I think he gets by because he's a big guy who can dribble like a PG, can shoot and can absorb contact going to the basket. He's Magic with Dwight Howards body! Talented? Yes! Best player in the game? Suspect! Can't see any evidence of him making anyone on Cleveland better than they were during his seven years there!
 
There is only one Michael Jordan. No one will have a legacy like MJ. And MJ did have that killer instinct, but he never would have won ANY championships if the Bulls never got Scottie and his legacy would be a lot closer to Jerry West's legacy then the MJ we know if he never got Scottie.

The Cavs were in no way able to get Lebron a great player, so he left.

Kobe pouted and wined like a BABY when he had no great players around him. He demanded a trade so many times. He conceded he couldn't win without another great player. So they got Gasol, who is definitely a top 10 current NBA player.

Lebron's 1 hour special was a stupid mistake, but a stupid mistake most 25 year olds would make if given the chance.

The point is that LeBron had the chance to create an MJ or Kobe-like legacy by going anywhere but Miami. If going somewhere and winning was all he wanted, then he should have gone to Chicago where he would win and be the top guy on the team. Instead he said that he didn't really want the pressure at the end of the game by going to Wade's team.

I don't understand how people don't see the irony of him calling himself the King all these years only to go play sidekick to Dwayne in "Wade" County. Clearly he doesn't want to be the King.
 
A "King" does not relinquish his throne! Jordan allowed the Bulls to build around him with Pippen/Grant and later by adding Rodman/Harper, but by and large it was MJ who was the leader of the Bulls.

Magic was drafted by the Lakers, but left the game as the all time assist leader until Stockton broke that record. But even as a rookie almost had a triple double playing center against the Sixers in the NBA finals, something like 42 pts, 10 reb, 9 asst! Kareem may have been the all-time scoring leader, but Magic quickly established himself as the catalyst that made "Showtime" a feature in LA.

That being said, the Heat is Dwyane Wade's team. No If's, And's, or But's about it! If the clock is winding down and LeBron has the ball in his hands, I'm comfortable he'd pass the ball to another player to take the last shot. He's proven that he can get a triple double and be an all around player. If the clocks winding down and Wade has the ball in his hands.......He's Shootin'! Why? Because it's his team! He's the only guy out of the "little 3" with a ring!

At the end of the day, Lebron doesn't owe Cleveland anything. I can live with his decision of going to Miami because I've never seen him as being the best player in the game. I think he gets by because he's a big guy who can dribble like a PG, can shoot and can absorb contact going to the basket. He's Magic with Dwight Howards body! Talented? Yes! Best player in the game? Suspect! Can't see any evidence of him making anyone on Cleveland better than they were during his seven years there!

Agree with everything but the last paragraph. LeBron made bums like Varajao and Daniel Gibson look like decent NBA regulars. LeBron makes the players around him better because he usually defers.

The thing that truly makes this a waste is that LeBron's potential is through the roof. He could be better than anyone who's ever played...but he doesn't want to be. He doesn't want to lead. The reason it's disappointing is because us fans won't get to see him try to reach his true potential.
 
Look I don't care either way, but let me ask this.....So, If Lebron goes to Miami..averages more points, rebounds and assists than Wade...is it still Wades team?....or is Wade really gonna be the Pippen to Lebron?......I think Lebron is a better overall player than Wade...and this could be a real possibility.
 
Look I don't care either way, but let me ask this.....So, If Lebron goes to Miami..averages more points, rebounds and assists than Wade...is it still Wades team?....or is Wade really gonna be the Pippen to Lebron?......I think Lebron is a better overall player than Wade...and this could be a real possibility.

In this whole charade it's been clear that Wade is the alpha here. He's been the decision maker, he's been the one pulling the strings. He's the one with the ring and 7 years of tenure. Why would anything change? Being the better player doesn't appear to be important to LBJ at this point. Check out this week's SI cover if you need more evidence of that. The deputy barely makes it on the cover...a cover he once owned.

tx_cover_bigthree.jpg
 
Last edited:
In this whole charade it's been clear that Wade is the alpha here. He's been the decision maker, he's been the one pulling the strings. He's the one with the ring and 7 years of tenure. Why would anything change? Being the better player doesn't appear to be important to LBJ at this point. Check out this week's SI cover if you need more evidence of that. The deputy barely makes it on the cover...a cover he once owned.

tx_cover_bigthree.jpg

OK...but I ask you...If he goes there and outperforms Wade...then what?
 
OK...but I ask you...If he goes there and outperforms Wade...then what?

I don't know. Just because a guy scores more points than Wade doesn't mean it isn't still his team. If the pendulum started to swing that way from a true leadership perspective, there may be tension among the ranks. But LBJ has never shown himself to be the leadership type so I don't think that's going to happen. Being the leader isn't always about scoring the most points.
 
I don't know. Just because a guy scores more points than Wade doesn't mean it isn't still his team. If the pendulum started to swing that way from a true leadership perspective, there may be tension among the ranks. But LBJ has never shown himself to be the leadership type so I don't think that's going to happen. Being the leader isn't always about scoring the most points.

I didn't say just points......He was a leader on Cleveland's team..just didn't have enough firepower behind him......It wouldn't surprise me at all if he becomes the best player on that Miami team...and leads them with his play.
 
I didn't say just points......He was a leader on Cleveland's team..just didn't have enough firepower behind him......It wouldn't surprise me at all if he becomes the best player on that Miami team...and leads them with his play.

Being the best or most talented player doesn't necessarily make you the leader. Leaders don't quit during the playoffs. And he had enough firepower to win 60+ games 2 years in a row, so I think he had enough to win with.
 
Being the best or most talented player doesn't necessarily make you the leader. Leaders don't quit during the playoffs. And he had enough firepower to win 60+ games 2 years in a row, so I think he had enough to win with.

Funny thing how everybody still wanted this quitter..especially the former owner who he suppposedly quit on isnt it?
 
Funny thing how everybody still wanted this quitter..especially the former owner who he suppposedly quit on isnt it?

No one ever said the guy wasn't talented. Talent is talent. Plain and simple. Same reason people offer scholarships to guys with rap sheets, bad attitudes, and bad grades.

Did anyone question his talent? I haven't seen that anywhere. Nor do I see anywhere where I said I wouldn't want him on my team.
 
No one ever said the guy wasn't talented. Talent is talent. Plain and simple. Same reason people offer scholarships to guys with rap sheets, bad attitudes, and bad grades.

Did anyone question his talent? I haven't seen that anywhere. Nor do I see anywhere where I said I wouldn't want him on my team.

Exactly what Im getting at....you don't have to be a leader(even though I say he is) to be the greatest basketball player in the world. He is the best currently in the NBA....regardless of who's team Miami is...what does it matter....again....I don't care what single player you put on that Cleveland team last year other than Lebron...they weren't gonna win a title...be it Kobe, Wade..anybody...didn't have the talent.....they won the most regualr season games because of Lebrons motor...when many other teams were tired or just mailed it in on a regular season nignt because it didn't mean a whole lot (happens in the NBA..not right but it does). Lebron did almost all of it himself...but in the playoffs...when all the vets were locked in...ready to play for these other teams...you gotta have some help...and Cleveland just didn't have it.
 
I didn't say just points......He was a leader on Cleveland's team..just didn't have enough firepower behind him......It wouldn't surprise me at all if he becomes the best player on that Miami team...and leads them with his play.

Obviously you didn't watch the 2008 Olympics. If you did, you would understand how LeBron is going to take a backseat like he did to Wade and Kobe in Beijing. LBJ has proven who he is.
 
Exactly what Im getting at....you don't have to be a leader(even though I say he is) to be the greatest basketball player in the world. He is the best currently in the NBA....regardless of who's team Miami is...what does it matter....again....I don't care what single player you put on that Cleveland team last year other than Lebron...they weren't gonna win a title...be it Kobe, Wade..anybody...didn't have the talent.....they won the most regualr season games because of Lebrons motor...when many other teams were tired or just mailed it in on a regular season nignt because it didn't mean a whole lot (happens in the NBA..not right but it does). Lebron did almost all of it himself...but in the playoffs...when all the vets were locked in...ready to play for these other teams...you gotta have some help...and Cleveland just didn't have it.

Wow. Just wow. How can a "leader" go on national television and rip the hearts out of the fans that loved him for 7 years? How can a "leader" not want to carry his team to a win whenever he gets on the court?
 
1st off...its not his job to placate the Cleveland fans....and Im talking about being a leader on the court....

In the 2010 playoffs Lebron averaged 29.1 pts, 9.3 rebounds and 7.6 assists...and not one player on his team voiced a problem with Lebron not caring or leading the team....Id say he was their leader.

And in the last 3 losses to Boston, he put up averages of 21ppg-11.7rbs-8assists.....and people say this guy quit?.....Looks like he played his butt off.

But hey...I guess Kobe's a great leader huh?....Demanding trades on the radio when all of sudden his team isnt stacked to his liking...ask the people in a certain health spa in Utah if Kobe is a leader, but hes one a few titles with loaded teams, oh wait, I forgot being a leader isn't all about what you do ON the court. Kobe would have whined like a 6 year old if he had to play with this team Lebron had in Cleveland and he would have left or made a clown of himself trying.
 
But hey...I guess Kobe's a great leader huh?....Demanding trades on the radio when all of sudden his team isnt stacked to his liking...ask the people in a certain health spa in Utah if Kobe is a leader, but hes one a few titles with loaded teams, oh wait, I forgot being a leader isn't all about what you do ON the court. Kobe would have whined like a 6 year old if he had to play with this team Lebron had in Cleveland and he would have left or made a clown of himself trying.


If you take Gasol and Jamison out of the equation (probably the 2nd best players on each team), I think that I would rather have the Cavs talent. Now does Jamison v. Gasol make that big of a difference when you figure the difference between Mo Williams and Derek Fisher and AP with Ron Artest? No.

The biggest difference between those two teams is the leader of the team and the coach of the team. Kobe is a much better player and Phil is one of the top 3 NBA coaches of all time.

http://kissmyasslebron.bigcartel.com/product/you-can-head-south-but-your-mom-rides-west
 
If you take Gasol and Jamison out of the equation (probably the 2nd best players on each team), I think that I would rather have the Cavs talent. Now does Jamison v. Gasol make that big of a difference when you figure the difference between Mo Williams and Derek Fisher and AP with Ron Artest? No.

The biggest difference between those two teams is the leader of the team and the coach of the team. Kobe is a much better player and Phil is one of the top 3 NBA coaches of all time.

http://kissmyasslebron.bigcartel.com/product/you-can-head-south-but-your-mom-rides-west

As much as I love AP.....Artest is much better.....Fisher is a much better crunchtime player/decision maker than Mo Williams...and Odom is better than anyone the Cavs had as well.....How did those Lakers do for 2 years before they got Gasol?
 
As much as I love AP.....Artest is much better.....Fisher is a much better crunchtime player/decision maker than Mo Williams...and Odom is better than anyone the Cavs had as well.....How did those Lakers do for 2 years before they got Gasol?


My point was that it is debatable. Artest is probably a bit better, but Fisher v. Mo Williams is no contest. Odom v. Mo Williams talent wise would be a better comparison really.

The two years before they got Gasol they trotted out a team that Luke Walton and Smush Parker were their #3 and 4 options, so I am not sure what the point there is. No one doubts that Gasol is better than both of those guys combined.

The Cavs roster is not as pathetic as everyone is making it out to be. LeBron didn't win when it mattered the most. They managed to win 60 games with that roster, but it wasn't good enough to beat an old mash crew of the Celtics? Also, the 66 win team the year before wasn't good enough in the primetime to beat the Magic.

Take LeBron off there, and I still think that team with a few minor additions could sneak into the playoffs next spring as an 8 seed. Wouldn't that be neat, Cleveland v. Miami in the first round next year. Of course it will be a Chicago-Cleveland matchup as the 1-8 seeds.
 
My point was that it is debatable. Artest is probably a bit better, but Fisher v. Mo Williams is no contest. Odom v. Mo Williams talent wise would be a better comparison really.

The two years before they got Gasol they trotted out a team that Luke Walton and Smush Parker were their #3 and 4 options, so I am not sure what the point there is. No one doubts that Gasol is better than both of those guys combined.

The Cavs roster is not as pathetic as everyone is making it out to be. LeBron didn't win when it mattered the most. They managed to win 60 games with that roster, but it wasn't good enough to beat an old mash crew of the Celtics? Also, the 66 win team the year before wasn't good enough in the primetime to beat the Magic.

Take LeBron off there, and I still think that team with a few minor additions could sneak into the playoffs next spring as an 8 seed. Wouldn't that be neat, Cleveland v. Miami in the first round next year. Of course it will be a Chicago-Cleveland matchup as the 1-8 seeds.

No way...you take Lebron off that team last year and you think they could have been as good as the Bulls who were the 8 seed last year.....I doubt it...but thats my opinion.
 
Back
Top