But Lefty, that's not how Mark Tupper described the Illinois win over Clemson. No where in his articles does he lay the blame on Clamson for "letting the game slip away", or that Clemson "fell asleep" and "let Illinois win the game".
Instead, he uses highly complimentary terms for the Illini comeback like-
the greatest comeback in Illini basketball history....
Illinois came from 23 down to fight past 18th-ranked Clemson 76-74....
I can??™t tell you in strong enough terms how thoroughly Illinois underwent a personality transplant in the second half....
Instead of meek, they were confident....
Instead of slow, they were quick....
Instead of passive, they were aggressive....
Instead of freshmen, Brandon Paul and D.J. Richardson looked like experienced upperclassmen....
It was a stunning victory that came after consecutive losses to Utah and Bradley....
I felt like we were watching this team grow up....
it was a whale of a game....
http://www.herald-review.com/app/blogs/marktupper/?p=717
So it is not just the way Mark Tupper likes to describe a game. He is clearly one sided in his descriptions of these 2 games. If any writer is unfairly biased, inconsistent, or hypocritical, why shouldn't people here have the right to point it out. Goodness knows there are enough people who jump on a few Bradley fans here every time they think they perceive a slight bias or inconsistency.