• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Rate Coach Les

I thought I'd chime in right about now. St Mary's is a tunnel and bridge away from the San Francisco but they also are taking another route to recruiting. They are recruiting in Australia. Patty Mills is Australian as well as few other highly skilled players on that team. The Bay Area is beautiful but it is not a hot bed for college sports. There are tons of transplants from all over.

Peoria is a small city with terrible weather and let's not carried away with culture. Most basketball players could care less about what is playing at the opera house or what show is coming through the local theater. What they care about is what does the local night life and women look like. Players and students alike would not choose to come to Peoria to attend BU but go to BU and thus are stuck in Peoria. They later learn that Peoria has charm, character and great fans.

I believe we can compete with the Gonzaga and Butler for recruits even in Peoria. There really is not much difference in terms of social structure in their prospective areas. I believe our new facilities will draw those 3 star guys and one never knows when we'll get that coveted 4-5 star. If we start winning and playing an OOC schedule like Gonzaga why would they not want to play for JL? It is all about winning and creating an environment the players can flourish and feel good. It can be done in Peoria.
Good one SFP, I agree:!:
 
have more freshmen applicants to BU than in the pre-Les years (due to national exposure from BU Hoops),

Keep up the good work Jimmy! BU basketball's heading in the right direction :) .

you really think it's due to national exposure from BU hoops?....
 
I really didn't want to get involved in this thread. I think we've probably had this discussion 10 times over since I've started on this board. It's a great discussion to have, but none the less predictable. As far as JL is concerned among all coaches I'll give him about a 7/10. For BU, I'll give him a 10 out of 10. I love that JL is a BU alum, and takes pride in that. If you look at how short his career really has been in coaching, I think he's progressing really fast, and gets better every year.

I also think a lot of criticisms of him are a little ridiculous, everyone wants bigger players, and point to the MSU's of the world and such. But where are these people going to come from? There is a lot more depth at guard than at forward/center, so JL gets BBall players. I think we're a long way from being able to get these highly touted big men, so we get the ones we can and do what we can with them. I look around at other mid-majors and don't really see anyone with better/more skilled big men than us in the next few years. IMO ODU and oakland didn't have talented ball players, just big bodies, and that's not gonna work in the MVC with the way fouls are called (Part of the reason we have trouble getting big men). The POB's of the world are few and far between, and I think we landed soemone as good in Jordan Prosser.

With that being said, I would like to see us play a larger line up, but can anyone really make a case that this year we should have started 2 F/C's?
 
With that being said, I would like to see us play a larger line up, but can anyone really make a case that this year we should have started 2 F/C's?

I agree on all counts and once WE went down a BIG NO! Next year especially early on NO, also!

JL is the perfect coach for BU! The right coach at the right time and he will take us to the next level and I bet he'll probably not be coaxed into leaving anytime soon once he geta us there. There is something to say about LOYALTY.:D
 
...have more freshmen applicants to BU than in the pre-Les years (due to national exposure from BU Hoops)...

Thats not really true, the freshman numbers have been pretty low the last couple years and are WAY down this year. I don't think this has anything at all to do with JL either way tho...
 
you really think it's due to national exposure from BU hoops?....
The BU administration has stated that there was a quantifiable increase in applicants after the S16 run. I do think that S16 "bubble effect" is now gone, but in the past 3 years, BU hoops had increased the # of applicants. I suppose this year, BU Hoops increased the # of applicants by 1, but unfortunatley, the NCAA dicd not allow JW to play..
 
Thats not really true, the freshman numbers have been pretty low the last couple years and are WAY down this year. I don't think this has anything at all to do with JL either way tho...

I just saw a report that most private schools applications are down this year due to the economy. The public schools are generally twice as inexpensive even though schools like BU will probably give out more financial aid to make up the difference.
 
I really didn't want to get involved in this thread. I think we've probably had this discussion 10 times over since I've started on this board. It's a great discussion to have, but none the less predictable. As far as JL is concerned among all coaches I'll give him about a 7/10. For BU, I'll give him a 10 out of 10. I love that JL is a BU alum, and takes pride in that. If you look at how short his career really has been in coaching, I think he's progressing really fast, and gets better every year.

I also think a lot of criticisms of him are a little ridiculous, everyone wants bigger players, and point to the MSU's of the world and such. But where are these people going to come from? There is a lot more depth at guard than at forward/center, so JL gets BBall players. I think we're a long way from being able to get these highly touted big men, so we get the ones we can and do what we can with them. I look around at other mid-majors and don't really see anyone with better/more skilled big men than us in the next few years. IMO ODU and oakland didn't have talented ball players, just big bodies, and that's not gonna work in the MVC with the way fouls are called (Part of the reason we have trouble getting big men). The POB's of the world are few and far between, and I think we landed soemone as good in Jordan Prosser.

With that being said, I would like to see us play a larger line up, but can anyone really make a case that this year we should have started 2 F/C's?


I've never talked about who JL recruits or how big his lineup is. I really don't care. I will trust his judgement for that.
I do think however we should winning a conference or the tourney every now and then....when we do that some(or at least be there at the last day) then the NCAA tourney will take care of itself
 
"With that being said, I would like to see us play a larger line up, but can anyone really make a case that this year we should have started 2 F/C's?"

We should have had at least two bigger players playing....but when WE went down we really could not....but I would have liked to see

SM
DD
TW
TB
DC

At least that is bigger.....
or

SM
DD
TW
SS
DC

hmmmm
 
Actually, there was an increase in both applicants and quality of applicants (increased selectivity) from 1997-2003. From 2003-2006 there was stagnation. After 2006, though applications rose, enrollment has not reciprocated and as amckillip posted earlier, has been in a decline since 2007 and expected to continue next year.
 
The situation Bradley is in isn't unique to 2009. Or to Jim Les. Peoria has always been Peoria. BU has always been in the MVC. I dont think anyone expects BU to compete with BCS type schools on a yearly basis.

One beautiful thing about BU hoops is how consistent it has been in many ways. Fans always come. Excitement is always there. The city is still the same. I used to think expectations were higher but maybe that has changed.
 
I just saw a report that most private schools applications are down this year due to the economy. The public schools are generally twice as inexpensive even though schools like BU will probably give out more financial aid to make up the difference.

Oh, I agree completely, and I'd say the increase in number of application ahd far more to do with a booming economy than our Sweet Sicteen run... And I've done analysis projects for the admissions office. I can ASSURE you whoever said it had anything to do with the sweet sixteen run is makign an assumption, because they by NO MEANS have any sort of way to capture that data... Would have made my life a alot easier if they had...
 
Oh, I agree completely, and I'd say the increase in number of application ahd far more to do with a booming economy than our Sweet Sicteen run... And I've done analysis projects for the admissions office. I can ASSURE you whoever said it had anything to do with the sweet sixteen run is makign an assumption, because they by NO MEANS have any sort of way to capture that data... Would have made my life a alot easier if they had...


Let B4L in on that secret will you?
 
Without a doubt.

This isn't the article I first saw info from George Mason, but its the first I found on Google. The stats don't lie that a big run in the tournament significantly change applicant numbers.

Excerpt from http://eagle.gmu.edu/newsroom/591/
"Admissions

* Freshmen applications have increased by 20 percent.
* The number and size of campus tours for prospective students and parents nearly tripled.

Alumni Relations

* Mason alumni who registered with the online alumni directory have grown by more than 52 percent.
* There is a 24 percent increase in alumni e-mail addresses now registered on record.
* There is a 25 percent increase in active alumni.

Development/Fundraising

* Mason received more than $23.2 million in new gifts and pledge payments compared to $19.6 million the previous year.
* Donations to athletic programs increased by 25 percent.
* General scholarship support nearly tripled.
* Unrestricted gifts to the university increased by nearly 45 percent."
 
Yeah, but theres a world of difference between a Final Four run and a Sweet Sixteen run... Show me that data for BU... the trend isn't nearly as convincing.
 
Thanks for the help BUBalum05 :) . I'm simply reporting info I heard second hand from someone in-the-know at BU (at that time). Your facts help keep the egg off my face ;)
 
"With that being said, I would like to see us play a larger line up, but can anyone really make a case that this year we should have started 2 F/C's?"

We should have had at least two bigger players playing....but when WE went down we really could not....but I would have liked to see

SM
DD
TW
TB
DC

At least that is bigger.....
or

SM
DD
TW
SS
DC

hmmmm

I'm thinking, Always play 2 bigs. Why can't the staff teach each big man 2 or 3 offensive sets. Execute those sets to perfection. Let the guards add a few variations and substitute like mad.
(So you end up with a bunch of variation, just do not ask each big attempt to do too much) Also, A new big can learn one D (man or a specific zone type), experienced 2. Swap bigs when you want to swap strategy. (I think weask too much from a big so they usually not in the best position to succeed)
 
Just remember...

Applications can go up, but class size does not always increase because of that. Just because they apply doesn't mean they're signing the dotted lined to show up.
 
Back
Top