I have posted my opinion numerous places, and it is consistent time, and time, and time again.....unlike the opinions of people who are self serving.
I said BU holds its athletes to standards higher than apparently most other institutions do.
I don't know if the charges have any validity, but I applaud that the school has acted immediately unlike, as Da Coach said, other schools.
If domestic issues automatically disqualify a person for life from any useful or gainful activity, then schools like Memphis and Mizzou wouldn't have enough players to field a team.
This is a rare event at BU and the school is dealing properly with it.
None of us knows the truth, so I, for one, don't plan to judge the kid based on hearsay, like apparently most people do.
Again, few people on any message board have been as consistent in any arena as I have been in this one.
The athletes should and must behave or they forfeit their right to play ball for the school. Most schools don't do it that way, most just ignore the offenses until they happen repeatedly and the coach is forced by public pressure to act. Anyone remember the 4 or 5 times Mike Taylor ran afoul of the law at Iowa State, and the multiple DUI's at certain schools, and the 6-8 players at Memphis who have had repeated serious legal issues, and the felonies at Georgia and UIUC?
It's never been about the players, it has been about the ridiculously soft discipline and phony lip-service zero-tolerance policies that coaches don't have the guts to enforce since they covet the wins and the talent more than the discipline.
That simply does NOT happen at BU and the difference is clear to anyone who wants to see it.