Future Walk-On
New member
I am encouraged by this class. The Wilkins incident is slowly fading...........
ehhh
I am encouraged by this class. The Wilkins incident is slowly fading...........
It won't, wait till you see him play. He's gonna be a good one. I'm not saying Sean isn't going to be a player here. I'm tickled to death to get him. All I'm saying is JW is gonna be really good for ISU.I am encouraged by this class. The Wilkins incident is slowly fading...........
It won't, wait till you see him play. He's gonna be a good one. I'm not saying Sean isn't going to be a player here. I'm tickled to death to get him. All I'm saying is JW is gonna be really good for ISU.
I am encouraged by this class. The Wilkins incident is slowly fading...........
I Don't Know Who That Is.
Gonna play devil's advocate here for a second -
1. How do we know the recruiting classes are getting better? Do we have anything to prove that they've been any better than any of JL's other recruiting classes?
2. Why would we start playing with 2 forwards and a center now when we haven't for the better part of a decade? Do you really think that there's going to be this massive philosophical shift all of the sudden? We had 'Cellus, Zach, and POB and didn't play that way. Do you think that we'll ever have 3 guys more suited to play those roles than those 3? We may NEVER have 3 guys more suited to play that style than those 3, and very rarely if ever were they on the court together.
Not going after you real fan, just wondering how you came to these conclusions.
Wishful thinkingGonna play devil's advocate here for a second -
1. How do we know the recruiting classes are getting better? Do we have anything to prove that they've been any better than any of JL's other recruiting classes?
2. Why would we start playing with 2 forwards and a center now when we haven't for the better part of a decade? Do you really think that there's going to be this massive philosophical shift all of the sudden? We had 'Cellus, Zach, and POB and didn't play that way. Do you think that we'll ever have 3 guys more suited to play those roles than those 3? We may NEVER have 3 guys more suited to play that style than those 3, and very rarely if ever were they on the court together.
Not going after you real fan, just wondering how you came to these conclusions.
Anyone know if he's able to work on his game while in Honduras? He may have to redshirt a year if eligible, just to get back into the flow of the game.
Jason
.....
Not going after you real fan, just wondering how you came to these conclusions.
Anyone know if he's able to work on his game while in Honduras?
Jason
He looks good!
Gonna play devil's advocate here for a second -
1. How do we know the recruiting classes are getting better? Do we have anything to prove that they've been any better than any of JL's other recruiting classes?
2. Why would we start playing with 2 forwards and a center now when we haven't for the better part of a decade? Do you really think that there's going to be this massive philosophical shift all of the sudden? We had 'Cellus, Zach, and POB and didn't play that way. Do you think that we'll ever have 3 guys more suited to play those roles than those 3? We may NEVER have 3 guys more suited to play that style than those 3, and very rarely if ever were they on the court together.
Not going after you real fan, just wondering how you came to these conclusions.
We won't have much choice. Have you seen the roster for next year? It has eight bigs and 5 guards. If we are not playing 2 forwards and a center then it will have to be 3 forwards. There just wont be enough guards on the roster to play 3 guards very often.
If we play three guards we won't be two deep at each position. That would leave us four deep at both the bigs positions. The math says we have to have 3 bigs on the court more often than we have 3 guards next year.
Unless the roster changes you will see BU going big next year. We have no choice.
We won't have much choice. Have you seen the roster for next year? It has eight bigs and 5 guards. If we are not playing 2 forwards and a center then it will have to be 3 forwards. There just wont be enough guards on the roster to play 3 guards very often.
If we play three guards we won't be two deep at each position. That would leave us four deep at both the bigs positions. The math says we have to have 3 bigs on the court more often than we have 3 guards next year.
Unless the roster changes you will see BU going big next year. We have no choice.
We won't have much choice. Have you seen the roster for next year? It has eight bigs and 5 guards. If we are not playing 2 forwards and a center then it will have to be 3 forwards. There just wont be enough guards on the roster to play 3 guards very often.
If we play three guards we won't be two deep at each position. That would leave us four deep at both the bigs positions. The math says we have to have 3 bigs on the court more often than we have 3 guards next year.
Unless the roster changes you will see BU going big next year. We have no choice.
We will have a lot of bigs next year as far as quantity is concerned...but outside of Egolf, Prosser, and Taylor Brown, I don't see any of them being threats to be big parts of the rotation...Harris could be a wild card depending on what kind of shape he is going to be able to get into before the season kicks off...but Wells, Davis, Thompson, and Knezevic, that is just a group of guys that look to me to be nothing more than redshirt candidates or borderline D-I players at this point.
We'll still have to play a bunch of guards if and when the depth doesn't materialize in the frontcourt...problem is that we won't have the depth in the backcourt next year that we have had for the last few years...so we really will be asking for a lot out of freshman Abell and Stewart...