• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Ugly game of the day

..... I think any of the posters here would be "hard working", "honorable" and "loyal"...but that doesn't mean we should be coaching.

Apparently their savior coach they hired to replace Joplin, Gene Cross, wasn't "honorable" enough for Toledo.
 
Sorry you cannot see the obvious similarities. I only mentioned this one example because of the odd and embarrasing news they made last night, but there are many others. And it is highly relevant to bring up these similar situations. Toledo thought they could do better and fired a decent coach. Now they are far worse off, and prior to the coaching change last year, the fans would have gladly taken the old coach back.

Again, this is a highly relevant comparison. If you want more, I'll gladly list dozens of more cases where a coaching change did not work out nearly as well as admins and fans had hoped. Just look at where Providence is at now. It is proof that fans should be careful what they wish for.
Amazing how the fire-the-coach fans do not even like to hear these examples.
 
Sorry you cannot see the obvious similarities. I only mentioned this one example because of the odd and embarrasing news they made last night, but there are many others. And it is highly relevant to bring up these similar situations. Toledo thought they could do better and fired a decent coach. Now they are far worse off, and prior to the coaching change last year, the fans would have gladly taken the old coach back.

Again, this is a highly relevant comparison. If you want more, I'll gladly list dozens of more cases where a coaching change did not work out nearly as well as admins and fans had hoped. Just look at where Providence is at now. It is proof that fans should be careful what they wish for.
Amazing how the fire-the-coach fans do not even like to hear these examples.

Da Coach..come on. I thought we moved on. There ARE examples where firing the coach didn't work. I've admitted this. Just as there ARE examples where firing the coach did work.

Why is this a hard concept to grasp? Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't. I think we are all smart enough to understand this concept.

Some want it to happen and are willing to try something new, some don't want to happen and are cool with the status quo. God Bless America.
 
I can find cases where hiring a new coach is great and where it has failed. Each side of this argument can find some instance to support their cause. Doesn't make the argument any better either way.
 
Why is this a hard concept to grasp? Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't. I think we are all smart enough to understand this concept.

This part we agree on.
But we have posters citing cases where they say firing a coach lead to a great turnaround, and then they give us examples like Missouri State, which is still a work-in-progress at best. It is only fair to point out there are many cases that are not successful. That's all. Why are you and others right in this thread trying so hard to deny that this case is a relevant similarity to where we are now?
 
I can find cases where hiring a new coach is great and where it has failed. Each side of this argument can find some instance to support their cause. Doesn't make the argument any better either way.


I am always open to people posting examples that support their viewpoint.
I have trouble understanding why anyone opposes that.
Where are all the examples of midmajors firing their coach and going on to a significantly greater success, or making the NCAA? I am not saying there are not some examples, but they are fewer than some pro-coaching change people believe. For every success like Tim Jankovich at ISU (:)), there are a number of Jim Whitesells and Rick Majerus examples. In fact, every midmajor college in Illinois and dozens more in the midwest, have changed coach, some several times, since Jim Les was hired. Where are all the success stories?
 
Why not look at past coaching changes at BU?

Stowell v. Versace - definite upgrade.
Versace v. Albeck - different circumstances, but definite downgrade.
Albeck v. Molinari - upgrade
Molinari v. Les - honestly about equal?

I can't really speak further back than Stowell.

Isn't the average coaching tenure somewhere in the 6-8 year range?
 
OK, but at Toledo, that "bottoming out" has lasted 3 seasons since the coaching change, and the end it nowhere in sight. They are not just bottoming out, but a real embarrassment. Not comparable to our situation where the team underperformed, mostly due to unprecedented injury issues.

Kowalczyk thinks he has a better group coming in -- but his four incoming recruits are all four extremely obscure and either unrated or ZERO-stars.
 
On the other hand, is there any recent precedence of a Mid Major coach with 9+ years of experience with one program who hasn't finished in his Conference's top 3 yet, turning it around and winning his Conference/Post Season Tournament at the same program?
 
JMO

four guard offense
friend during ISU game..."he can't guard a 6-9 player"
they play out of position
rarely in position for a rebound
offensive scheme
willing to try something new
ever try playing 3 bigs at a time once this year
lose close games - :eek:
blow substantial leads - :eek:
I can see why people want change
I like JL
the players will stay
I hope the recruits come, they will help
I'll support whatever happens.
 
This part we agree on.
But we have posters citing cases where they say firing a coach lead to a great turnaround, and then they give us examples like Missouri State, which is still a work-in-progress at best.

Da Coach, how can you say that Missouri State is a work in progress at best?

The Bears are tied for the lead in the conference and can win it outright with a victory on Saturday in Springfield.

The worst they can finish is 2nd place. And this is only Martin's 3rd season.

Greg Lansing has finished 3rd in the MVC this year. It's his first season at Indiana State.
 
Da Coach, how can you say that Missouri State is a work in progress at best?

The Bears are tied for the lead in the conference and can win it outright with a victory on Saturday in Springfield.

The worst they can finish is 2nd place. And this is only Martin's 3rd season.

Greg Lansing has finished 3rd in the MVC this year. It's his first season at Indiana State.

Trust us. We know a work in progress when we see one.
 
This part we agree on.
But we have posters citing cases where they say firing a coach lead to a great turnaround, and then they give us examples like Missouri State, which is still a work-in-progress at best. It is only fair to point out there are many cases that are not successful. That's all. Why are you and others right in this thread trying so hard to deny that this case is a relevant similarity to where we are now?

Because I don't see the Toledo situation and Bradley situation similar at all. To me, Missouri State is a far more relevant example.

I've stated why. Toledo has had three coaches in about three, four years. One coach was let go for "off the court" stuff, not results related stuff. Tod K. is in his first year.

At Bradley we are talking about one coach in place for nine years. Not at all similar to Toledo. As I said, MSU firing Barry Hinson to go with Cuonzo Martin is a far, far, far more similar case.
 
On the other hand, is there any recent precedence of a Mid Major coach with 9+ years of experience with one program who hasn't finished in his Conference's top 3 yet, turning it around and winning his Conference/Post Season Tournament at the same program?

Honestly, no. There are very few mid-majors with standards of winning where a coach is allowed to stay 9+ years without winning at least half his games in his own league.
 
Why not look at past coaching changes at BU?

Stowell v. Versace - definite upgrade.
Versace v. Albeck - different circumstances, but definite downgrade.
Albeck v. Molinari - upgrade
Molinari v. Les - honestly about equal?

I can't really speak further back than Stowell.

Isn't the average coaching tenure somewhere in the 6-8 year range?

I love you for that range.

Sometimes change for change sake is good.

Its time for new blood.

This of course isnt all JL's fault. But I think we need change. I hope its coming.

Da Coach and others don't. Thats ok too...
 
Sometimes change for change sake is good.....

Da Coach and others don't. Thats ok too...

I am definitely not a fan of "change for change sake". I can't believe that you are really saying that you are.

It is only logical, and intelligent to look at every possible issue and circumstance before making a major move like a coaching change.

As I have asked elsewhere, where are all the examples of a coach in the MVC or similar situation being fiired and replaced, and making a major difference? Name one that made it to the NCAA inside of 4 or 5 years?
 
Back
Top