Let's just keep the status quo. Finish 4th or 5th.
But past results don't.....nevermind.....
Let's just keep the status quo. Finish 4th or 5th.
..... I think any of the posters here would be "hard working", "honorable" and "loyal"...but that doesn't mean we should be coaching.
Apparently their savior coach they hired to replace Joplin, Gene Cross, wasn't "honorable" enough for Toledo.
You have to trust your University President, and AD to make that decision which will have a tremoundous impact on the University as a whole.
Sorry you cannot see the obvious similarities. I only mentioned this one example because of the odd and embarrasing news they made last night, but there are many others. And it is highly relevant to bring up these similar situations. Toledo thought they could do better and fired a decent coach. Now they are far worse off, and prior to the coaching change last year, the fans would have gladly taken the old coach back.
Again, this is a highly relevant comparison. If you want more, I'll gladly list dozens of more cases where a coaching change did not work out nearly as well as admins and fans had hoped. Just look at where Providence is at now. It is proof that fans should be careful what they wish for.
Amazing how the fire-the-coach fans do not even like to hear these examples.
Why is this a hard concept to grasp? Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't. I think we are all smart enough to understand this concept.
I can find cases where hiring a new coach is great and where it has failed. Each side of this argument can find some instance to support their cause. Doesn't make the argument any better either way.
OK, but at Toledo, that "bottoming out" has lasted 3 seasons since the coaching change, and the end it nowhere in sight. They are not just bottoming out, but a real embarrassment. Not comparable to our situation where the team underperformed, mostly due to unprecedented injury issues.
This part we agree on.
But we have posters citing cases where they say firing a coach lead to a great turnaround, and then they give us examples like Missouri State, which is still a work-in-progress at best.
Da Coach, how can you say that Missouri State is a work in progress at best?
The Bears are tied for the lead in the conference and can win it outright with a victory on Saturday in Springfield.
The worst they can finish is 2nd place. And this is only Martin's 3rd season.
Greg Lansing has finished 3rd in the MVC this year. It's his first season at Indiana State.
This part we agree on.
But we have posters citing cases where they say firing a coach lead to a great turnaround, and then they give us examples like Missouri State, which is still a work-in-progress at best. It is only fair to point out there are many cases that are not successful. That's all. Why are you and others right in this thread trying so hard to deny that this case is a relevant similarity to where we are now?
On the other hand, is there any recent precedence of a Mid Major coach with 9+ years of experience with one program who hasn't finished in his Conference's top 3 yet, turning it around and winning his Conference/Post Season Tournament at the same program?
Why not look at past coaching changes at BU?
Stowell v. Versace - definite upgrade.
Versace v. Albeck - different circumstances, but definite downgrade.
Albeck v. Molinari - upgrade
Molinari v. Les - honestly about equal?
I can't really speak further back than Stowell.
Isn't the average coaching tenure somewhere in the 6-8 year range?
Sometimes change for change sake is good.....
Da Coach and others don't. Thats ok too...
Name one that made it to the NCAA inside of 4 or 5 years?