wow...do you really think that's being fair??
First...the SIU thread you linked was from Nov. 14...long before teams had played any games...so of course the RPI was meaningless back then.
But it does go on and on for four pages, and
the longer it goes on the more there is relevant talk of the RPI as a significant factor!!
In that exact same thread, if you go to the
current comments, they are talking about the RPI as if it is an important tool in assessing teams.
In other words...the very link you gave ends up
discrediting your point and disproving what you say!
http://www.salukitalk.net/st/viewtopic.php?p=590633#590633
Then the Shocker thread you linked to says this...
"by next week it (the RPI) should be close to accurate."
and it was posted LAST WEEK....so again, I guess I just don't see why you keep
linking to other people who disagree with you!!
and of course lastly...the valleytalk link is the one I'd put the least credibility into, as most of the stuff on VT is pretty inane, but again it is from over a week ago when Evansville had played only two games!...and it still proves people are talking about the RPI....
Most of all you totally bolstered my single strongest argument of all...
that the RPI is being discussed on every message board, and we are the only ones with the outside RPI-police telling us not to discuss it!!
Every message board in America has discussions about the RPI..."
RPI update...
Bradley at 67 just two notches behind Kansas (65) and ahead of Baylor & Ohio State.
ISU is at 171 just one notch ahead of Cornell (172) and a couple notches ahead of 0-5 Arkansas-Pine Bluff, and behind winless Texas-San Antonio.
Is it any wonder the ISU fans don't want to hear talk of RPI.