• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Visitor on campus- Coty Clarke

Well I am pretty sure that the practice of taking scholarships away from players that were expecting 4 years would not be something that prospective recruits would like to hear.

I personally love the Pierre Cooper story.

Same here. I wonder how often this would happen today at any school?
 
Based on pretty good info - I believe Bradley has never taken a scholarship from a player who was ELIGIBLE and wanted to stay at BU - NEVER
...and this is a statement very few schools can make..........
 
The only reason a school should consider taking back a scholarship is:

1. student/athlete doesn't meet established academic standards
2. student/athlete gets in trouble with the law
3. student/athlete has broken established team rules

That's it. Once a coach or school has established that they are going to run off players for other reasons they risk other consequences. Other coaches will use it against you during recruiting and a lower APR rate are just two. Plus, if coach or school starts to run off guys when they realize a kid can't contribute then don't be upset when your stars realize they can play at a higher level and leave. IMO commitment is a two way street.
 
The only reason a school should consider taking back a scholarship is:

1. student/athlete doesn't meet established academic standards
2. student/athlete gets in trouble with the law
3. student/athlete has broken established team rules

That's it. Once a coach or school has established that they are going to run off players for other reasons they risk other consequences. Other coaches will use it against you during recruiting and a lower APR rate are just two. Plus, if coach or school starts to run off guys when they realize a kid can't contribute then don't be upset when your stars realize they can play at a higher level and leave. IMO commitment is a two way street.

See page 6 on the link of my "The Shame of College Sports" thread. In 2008-09, the article states that 22% of all NCAA basketball scholarships were not renewed. A Rice University football player is suing the NCAA to remove the one year rule. His claim is that without that rule, he would have been able to negotiate with each of the eight schools that recruited him for a guaranteed term for his scholarship. Sounds interesting and fair...
 
I would hope Bradley NEVER accepts your first standard real fan. Unless a kid gets in trouble, shows lack of effort, doesn't get along with his teammates, or has poor grades he should be allowed to stay on scholarship all four years if he so chooses.

I would hope that BU never becomes like so many of those BCS schools (or ISU ;) ) that run off players just to free up a scholie for a better player.

Unfortunately we live in a world that expects winners and the coaching staff gets paid to produce championships, if our staff feels someone is not good enough to play on this team it has to have the power to make tough decisions as far as telling a player that if he expects to play then he needs to look elsewhere because he is not good enough to play here, you cannot keep unproductive players around if you plan on building a winner plus most players that do not improve are at fault for not working hard enough on their game over the summer.
 
... if our staff feels someone is not good enough to play on this team it has to have the power to make tough decisions as far as telling a player that if he expects to play then he needs to look elsewhere because he is not good enough to play here....

I agree that a coach has the right and a responsibility to tell a player this...... and if the player is smart he will leave..... but I don't think he should be forced out if he wanted to stay. I'd hate to see a player who gave 3 years to the team (in practice, the classroom, and the community) be forced to leave -- one year shy of graduation -- if a new coach came in and didn't like his talent level.
 
I agree that a coach has the right and a responsibility to tell a player this...... and if the player is smart he will leave..... but I don't think he should be forced out if he wanted to stay.

Good post, in fact I said something like it above. We are agreeing way too much today. :)
 
I believe UNC-Asheville honored the scholarship of 7'8" Kenny George after he had his foot amputated and his career ended in 2008.

The NCAA actually has a special Medical Scholarship designation for athletes who's career is cut short due to injuries. Illinois State had a basketball player a couple years ago that they used this special designation for (Mike Vandello). The athlete can remain on full scholarship until they graduate, and it will not count toward their maximum limit of total scholarships.
The medical condition has to be documented to the NCAA, and the athlete has to maintain good academic standing.
 
The only reason a school should consider taking back a scholarship is:

1. student/athlete doesn't meet established academic standards
2. student/athlete gets in trouble with the law
3. student/athlete has broken established team rules

That's it. Once a coach or school has established that they are going to run off players for other reasons they risk other consequences. Other coaches will use it against you during recruiting and a lower APR rate are just two. Plus, if coach or school starts to run off guys when they realize a kid can't contribute then don't be upset when your stars realize they can play at a higher level and leave. IMO commitment is a two way street.

I would add one more.

4. If a student/athlete does not put in the necessary work that a coach requests in improving their game. A scholarship is like a job and if you are lazy you should get canned.

T - I know how ruthless the game is but it does not make it right. Too much is put on winning on the court IMO (trust me I like a winner) instead of teaching our youth good values. That is why I like Butler. They seem to have developed a great balance. I believe we are headed in the right direction and I hope we do not take any short cuts.

BTW I can't wait to hear about Coty.:biggrin:
 
I agree that a coach has the right and a responsibility to tell a player this...... and if the player is smart he will leave..... but I don't think he should be forced out if he wanted to stay. I'd hate to see a player who gave 3 years to the team (in practice, the classroom, and the community) be forced to leave -- one year shy of graduation -- if a new coach came in and didn't like his talent level.

I am not saying anything about a player that has been here 3 years being forced out, most likely would be someone else.
 
Back
Top