DoubleJayAlum
New member
I am less than thrilled about the move and don't really want to see games at the on-campus arena. . .but frankly, the numbers support the move.
BU is not going broke, you are right. But they are conservative in spending right now and they aren't going to spend more in buying basketball games unless the funding comes from the source.
These games would be in addition to the season ticket package. The goal here is to play perhaps as many as 18 home games. Without looking it up, I imagine you have to go back to the 1960's to see that. Actual attendance numbers at games similar to the games we would play at the new arena would shock you...because those numbers are PATHETIC.
So I'm willing to give it a shot because I would take more home games, especially if it allows BU to go out and buy better opponents for games at Carver.
Adding these extra games to Carver, knowing that attendance would stink, BU would potentially lose money on them.
I don't see why some fans refuse to acknowledge the numbers and the long-term benefits to the move.
Ideally, the circumstances could be better surrounding the move. . .a larger on-campus arena would've been nice. A better team year in, year out would be nice because demand for the product and games at Carver would make this unnecessary. But I also understand why the University wants to make the move.
But I can agree to disagree.
Squirrel,
Out of curiosity, what is the approximate break even attendance number? (i.e., what does attendance have to be for BU to not experience a financial loss? I understand that one can't be exact because you never know the amount of concessions consumed from one game to the next, but I assume there is an approximate number.)
Also, does Bradley provide free transportation to students to get to the arena? Do any surrounding bars provide free shuttles?
As a fan of a school who plays its games in an off-campus arena as well, these issues are of interest to me....Thanks in advance....