Fair enough, but I'm not really talking about negotiating, how about "hey, thanks guys for the opportunity, I'm moving on." Just simple courtesy. I think we'd feel different, if the shoe was on the other foot. Say, Coach Les had followed up the Sweet 16 year with another trip to the Big Dance, and then left for a Big Ten school and we heard about it at that school's announcement.
Bradley appears to be unwilling to meet the demands of the buyout in Ford??™s contract, and that could force KSU to take legal action.
The university could expect Ford to come up with the entire $1.2 million the university believes it is owed. The contract called for a dollar-for-dollar buyout, and Ford had three years remaining on a deal worth $300,000 annually.
the guy who runs the Fiesta Bowl or anything![]()
Bradley appears to be unwilling to meet the demands of the buyout in Ford??™s contract, and that could force KSU to take legal action.Bradley appears to be unwilling to meet the demands of the buyout in Ford??™s contract, and that could force KSU to take legal action.
The university could expect Ford to come up with the entire $1.2 million the university believes it is owed. The contract called for a dollar-for-dollar buyout, and Ford had three years remaining on a deal worth $300,000 annually.
The university could expect Ford to come up with the entire $1.2 million the university believes it is owed. The contract called for a dollar-for-dollar buyout, and Ford had three years remaining on a deal worth $300,000 annually. Bradley appears to be unwilling to meet the demands of the buyout in Ford??™s contract, and that could force KSU to take legal action.
The university could expect Ford to come up with the entire $1.2 million the university believes it is owed. The contract called for a dollar-for-dollar buyout, and Ford had three years remaining on a deal worth $300,000 annually.
:?
http://www.recordpub.com/news/sports_article/5006767?page=0
That's strange. I didn't think the contract was binding both ways. That is, if the employee chose to move on to a new job, then the employee just doesn't get the money anymore. Why make the employee pay the employer if he's not working there anymore? The employer can then just use the funds it saved with the dissolved contract by hiring a new guy.
That's strange. I didn't think the contract was binding both ways. That is, if the employee chose to move on to a new job, then the employee just doesn't get the money anymore. Why make the employee pay the employer if he's not working there anymore? The employer can then just use the funds it saved with the dissolved contract by hiring a new guy.
Nice. Really like it. Im excited.
Except my phone keeps autocorrecting geno to genocide.