• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

BU 48 - MSU 51 Final

So you already know that Geno is a "middle of the road" coach based on 3/4 of 1 year?

I honestly don't think we can make any judgements on how Geno will be...not until he gets 2 years of his own guys.


Yes. I realize he needs to get his players here and I am not buying into his record in the MAC. I don't like our offensive schemes at all. (see my post on this thread as I was very complimentary of the execution of our offense last night.) I have been calling for us to use more baseline screens, multiple screens, and turns since probably the second game of the year and was absolutely giddy when I saw us use some of those concepts last night. I actually like the schemes we use on defense even though they don't always work out for us.

But back to the original question... What is our plan?
 
I saw a few good things from last night's game when we played like a team. I'm going out there to say if this team had a true PG we would have won at least 3 more games if not be around .500 in league play. I also thought we do not go inside enough to JP. There were a few times which one of our guards were driving in and with a flick of a wrist they could have hit JP with a pass wide open.

Unfortunately I don't think our players are alert enough and quick enough to dish the ball to open players. That's what seperates a good team from a bad team.
 
Yes. I realize he needs to get his players here and I am not buying into his record in the MAC. I don't like our offensive schemes at all. (see my post on this thread as I was very complimentary of the execution of our offense last night.) I have been calling for us to use more baseline screens, multiple screens, and turns since probably the second game of the year and was absolutely giddy when I saw us use some of those concepts last night. I actually like the schemes we use on defense even though they don't always work out for us.

But back to the original question... What is our plan?

What do you mean plan? The plan is to get players and compete for Valley titles.

Do you mean what is our defensive plan? offensive plan?

I think Coach Ford likes to let players create, many times off the dribble. I actually think Walt has the chance to score 15+ a game with a system like that. Freedom can be great for players, it can also be risky
 
Yes. I realize he needs to get his players here and I am not buying into his record in the MAC. I don't like our offensive schemes at all. (see my post on this thread as I was very complimentary of the execution of our offense last night.) I have been calling for us to use more baseline screens, multiple screens, and turns since probably the second game of the year and was absolutely giddy when I saw us use some of those concepts last night. I actually like the schemes we use on defense even though they don't always work out for us.

But back to the original question... What is our plan?

I would hope the plan is to get rid of the players that cannot contribute and bring in ones that can contribute, to not have a real shooting guard and a decent bench will get you many losses which has happened over the last 2 seasons, I cannot believe the coaching staff recruited so many below average players and anyone that does not believe this well our record and performance on the court speaks for itself.
 
Yes. I realize he needs to get his players here and I am not buying into his record in the MAC. I don't like our offensive schemes at all. (see my post on this thread as I was very complimentary of the execution of our offense last night.) I have been calling for us to use more baseline screens, multiple screens, and turns since probably the second game of the year and was absolutely giddy when I saw us use some of those concepts last night. I actually like the schemes we use on defense even though they don't always work out for us.

But back to the original question... What is our plan?

So you don't buy his record in the MAC. How then did he just happen to win the MAC two years in a row? Poor conference? More fundamentally sound shooters who fit in his system? Winning close games by pure luck? Why do you think his record was so good if you don't buy it then?

Not saying that I would agree or disagree with you. Just some legitimate questions that I am curious about Beninator.
 
So you don't buy his record in the MAC. How then did he just happen to win the MAC two years in a row? Poor conference? More fundamentally sound shooters who fit in his system? Winning close games by pure luck? Why do you think his record was so good if you don't buy it then?

Not saying that I would agree or disagree with you. Just some legitimate questions that I am curious about Beninator.

I am watching the NFL so I will just look at last year's record for now. Kent State was 25-12 last year. 17 of those wins were against teams with sub 150 RPI's. Those 17 wins are listed below.

Wins/RPI

Bryant-254
Lehigh-205
La Monroe-325
S Florida-155
Youngstown St-295
Bowling Green-245
Ohio-163
Ball St-167
Toledo-338
Cent Mich-307
E Michigan-324
N Illinois-317
W Michigan-174
Buffalo-166
Bowling Green-245
Buffalo-166
Ball St- 167

http://www.kentstatesports.com/sports/mbkb/2010-11/schedule

http://realtimerpi.com/2010-2011/rpi_252_Men.html
 
What do you mean plan? The plan is to get players and compete for Valley titles.

That should be the plan of every Bradley coach. Real fan is closer to what I would be looking for with an answer. Is the plan to bring in JUCO's, recruit Chicago more aggressively, recruit local players more aggressively, send current players to specific skill camps??? Unless I am missing something which could be the case, I haven't heard of a plan from Geno or from anybody on the Hilltop for that matter. --not that he should readily volunteer that information-- Yet I see a lot of people stating that we now have a plan. Just a curiosity of mine..

I would hope the plan is to get rid of the players that cannot contribute and bring in ones that can contribute, to not have a real shooting guard and a decent bench will get you many losses which has happened over the last 2 seasons, I cannot believe the coaching staff recruited so many below average players and anyone that does not believe this well our record and performance on the court speaks for itself.

I think that one of JL's mistakes is that he recruited too many athletes instead of basketball players and his guards had similar skill sets that weren't really compatible with his system. i.e. lack of outside shooters...
 
how many conf turney wins does he have? How many NCAA wins does he have?

So winning conferences dont matter? Anything can happen in a tournament. And yes, he was in a conference where regular season champion wasnt good enought to get into the NCAA. If you want to claim hes "in over his head" fine but reasonable people arent going to jump to that conclusion because of those specifications and this years results.
 
I still do not understand what fallout we are seeing. I see a new direction for a program. You have a good coaching staff and quality young men playing for Bradley...

If you cannot see fallout from the coaching change, then I doubt nothing will change your mind.
Bradley will almost certainly finish in 10th place this year.
Note that Bradley has never finished in 10th place in the MVC or in any conference they have been part of in 108 years of playing basketball.
Note that we will almost certainly see a losing home record this year, something we have never seen in the 9 seasons under the previous coach.
Note that we have already witnessed massive blowout losses, including the largest margin of loss at home in the entire 108 seasons of Bradley basketball, as well as several other blowouts that came close.
Note that people criticized previous coaches for their offense and their defense. But despite assurances of an uptempo offense, we are currently averaging significantly fewer ppg than last year, or any of the previous 7 years. And, we are also giving up 77.9 ppg on defense, a whopping 8 ppg more than last year, and way more than any Bradley team in decades!
We currently have a -14.2 ppg differential, which is greater than any season I can find in Bradley's history!
And I could list many more reasons for the fans' frustrations. Forgive us fans if we don't like the huge downturn we are seeing as a direct result of the coaching change with no assurances it will get any better anytime soon. Most fans would love to have your rose-colored glasses that see bright days ahead, but can you say things will be better next year, or the following year? - that is the fallout.
I'll support Geno, and I hope he can turn this downturn around quickly. But there is no way Bradley would be anywhere close to where they are now if not for all the fallout from the changes imposed.
 
I am watching the NFL so I will just look at last year's record for now. Kent State was 25-12 last year. 17 of those wins were against teams with sub 150 RPI's. Those 17 wins are listed below.

Wins/RPI

Bryant-254
Lehigh-205
La Monroe-325
S Florida-155
Youngstown St-295
Bowling Green-245
Ohio-163
Ball St-167
Toledo-338
Cent Mich-307
E Michigan-324
N Illinois-317
W Michigan-174
Buffalo-166
Bowling Green-245
Buffalo-166
Ball St- 167

http://www.kentstatesports.com/sports/mbkb/2010-11/schedule

http://realtimerpi.com/2010-2011/rpi_252_Men.html

That's a good point Beninator. But you can also argue that Bradley would have probably lost to half of these teams this year, and that Kent St. did beat 8 teams with RPI's of 150 or less, which again Bradley has failed miserably to do this year outside of beating UNI.

We have yet to see if Geno can rebuild a team in a tougher conference like ours. But I think based on the type of guys that he had at Kent St., and in a conference where it is tougher to recruit good players, he has shown he can do a great job putting together teams to fit his system.

I say let's wait until he has a full team of his players to see what he can do. Yes, there are some questionable moves that people have cited, but I really do think a new coach coming into this situation has his hands tied. At least he has kept us competitive for the most part, which while not acceptable in terms of wins and losses, at least is something to build on.
 
how many conf turney wins does he have? How many NCAA wins does he have?

Why is this so important for you to keep mentioning bu fan 9? Just because he didn't accomplish this at Kent St. doesn't mean he can't do this in the future. And at least he won the MAC regular season title twice, which is something most Les haters were complaining he could not do.
 
bu fan 9 is a long time fan and financial supporter of BU. I think bu fan 9's point, and a point of concern of many donors, is that the accomplishments do not seem to merit the massive contract BU is paying.
Where does the money come from?
 
That should be the plan of every Bradley coach. Real fan is closer to what I would be looking for with an answer. Is the plan to bring in JUCO's, recruit Chicago more aggressively, recruit local players more aggressively, send current players to specific skill camps??? Unless I am missing something which could be the case, I haven't heard of a plan from Geno or from anybody on the Hilltop for that matter. --not that he should readily volunteer that information-- Yet I see a lot of people stating that we now have a plan. Just a curiosity of mine..



I think that one of JL's mistakes is that he recruited too many athletes instead of basketball players and his guards had similar skill sets that weren't really compatible with his system. i.e. lack of outside shooters...

I think you answered your own question Beninator. Geno doesn't have time to volunteer that information because he is in the middle of the season right now. I'm sure all of this info regarding JUCO's and where the recruits will come from will be answered after the season ends.

Agreed about JL recruiting too many athletes over pure shooters. There is nothing wrong with recruiting athletes (which is tough to do at the mid-major level, so Les deserves credit there). But what good is that if they can't display proper basketball fundamentals. So yes, we do need to recruit more pure shooters that can fit Geno's system.
 
I'll support Geno, and I hope he can turn this downturn around quickly. But there is no way Bradley would be anywhere close to where they are now if not for all the fallout from the changes imposed.

Yeah...amazing how far we have fallen from the dizzying heights of last season :roll:

We are in this exact predicament because of Jim Les, period!

To borrow your line, if you can't see that BU is in a hole because of Jim Les, then I doubt anything will change your mind.
 
the PJS seems to be doing what you asked for- they aren't as negative.....

then you haven't read nor remembered anything I have ever said...
I simply want fairness - not constant biased negativity - nor rose colored glasses and constant praise for what replaced JL when the facts are - they simply do not deserve it...
is it too much to ask that they call it like it is?

I don' think the kids are talentless (as the PJS has said - the gap being as wide as the Grand Canyon) - nor do I think they are playing particularly well - but I think it is clear they are not playing well within the system that is being used...

Does anyone think a hurried, fade-away 3 pointer by a shooter who's only hitting a little over 20% is the type of shot we should be getting when we need just one point to avoid the loss?


Finally as posed elsewhere -- how many years is fair to ask for some positive results?
3, 4, maybe 5...shouldn't five years begin to produce something somewhere?
We are now 5 years into the post-Broski era...name the athletic programs that are doing better, drawing better attendances, or at a better stage now that when Broski left...come on -- should be at least one, right??
...I am waiting........lots of people gave their money so by now something ought to be noticable with more wins, more glory, more national press....
and don't get into the debate about the new facilities - since the biggest part of all the gifts from Markin, Puterbaugh, and Cat were all committed pre-2007..and the plans were all underway even by the end of 2006..
http://bradleyfans.com/vb/showpost.php?p=11456&postcount=18
http://bradleyfans.com/vb/showpost.php?p=7891&postcount=4
http://www.bubraves.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=3400&ATCLID=515906
http://campaign.bradley.edu/updates/givingfaculty.shtml
http://bradleyfans.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1085
 
Yeah...amazing how far we have fallen from the dizzying heights of last season :roll:

We are in this exact predicament because of Jim Les, period!

To borrow your line, if you can't see that BU is in a hole because of Jim Les, then I doubt anything will change your mind.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but IMO you are flat wrong. This team would be much better if the changes had not been forced upon them. And again the Jim Les detractors want us to believe that the 2010-2011 season was all the result of poor coaching, when reality is much different. History and the fans will judge the JL tenure by the successes he had when injuries were not such a massive factor.
Can anyone name a single midmajor team that had a successful season with 2 preseason all-conference players sidelined for the entire year?
But unfortnately, it doesn't really matter because even the great and loyal fans that have been with Bradley through all the ups and downs are not likely to continue to support this program if it continues in the downward direction that the changes have now taken it.
 
Back
Top