Scouter, I don??™t think I could feel any more differently than you (based on your flippant remarks above). No question, I had higher aspirations for this year??™s team. However, this team has faced a lot of adversity and never quit fighting. It would have been easy to ???mail it in??? at several points this season. They did not and are probably playing as well (despite last night) as they have all year. I am not sure if I will ???let the champagne (sic) flow,??? but winning 22 games three years in a row would certainly be a nice accomplishment. It is unfortunate you have no appreciation for that.
So finishing 17-15 in the regular season and getting to the finals of an inaugural third-tier tournament is a successful season? Even though this team was picked to finish second in the league and was supposed to be an NCAA tourney team? Getting to this point in this tournament does not make this a successful season, despite all the different selling points you could make because of it (three years with 20+ wins, three straight postseasons, etc.).
Yes, this team has faced a lot of adversity. But two of the four major issues that happened to this team were self-inflicted, which makes it harder for me to appreciate what they did because of that. In any case, this team never should've lost to UNI and WSU at home, even if Ruffin was out. They also shouldn't have looked like squat in the season opener against a less-than-stellar UIC team when we had everyone available. No excuses for those three losses. I'm sorry.
And how is "champagne" spelled wrong?