G
georgethedog
Guest
We need a petition dirve to change the MVC's name to help its recognition as a BIG conference. Here is my try:
The Immensely Big Valley
:lol:
The Immensely Big Valley
:lol:
Stryker said:How about "Big Valley 10"
"Valley Big 10" (to much like Big 10)
"Missouri Valley 10"
"MVC-10" (like PAC-10)
"Valley 10"
tornado said:Stryker said:How about "Big Valley 10"
"Valley Big 10" (to much like Big 10)
"Missouri Valley 10"
"MVC-10" (like PAC-10)
"Valley 10"
How about the Big Midwest?
or THE MIDWEST CONFERENCE
or The Big Nine (if the Big Ten can call themselves the Big Ten when they have 11 teams, we can be the Big Nine with ten teams!)
The BCS Killers
or America's Conference
BUSongwriter said:I've got the winner....
The Big Power Conference.
My guess is CBS and ESPN would sue, because it seems only they have the right to decide what is and isn't a power conference. But I like it!![]()
There was a lot of love down in StL for the MVC with the sold out crowds. Elgin's done a great job, but he's got a LOT of work left. I hope he's howling the next few days. Reaching the semifinals in all the other "power" conference tournaments is good enough. (Ex: Illinois). Not in ours.
Finally, the RPI can RIP. KenPom is now off my "favorites" list because RPI means nothing.
randy said:Rather than (or in addition to) renaming the conference, how about bulking up the quality even further by showing Evansville (and one of the ISUs :-o )the door and bringing in SLU and Butler?
I would sign on for replacing Evansville and Indiana State with SLU and Butler. That would be a nice trade!amckillip said:randy said:Rather than (or in addition to) renaming the conference, how about bulking up the quality even further by showing Evansville (and one of the ISUs :-o )the door and bringing in SLU and Butler?
As much as this idea scares me I think it's a good idea, I don't know if it would ever happen, but as far as legitimizing the MVC, it would go a long way.
shaunguth said:I would sign on for replacing Evansville and Indiana State with SLU and Butler. That would be a nice trade!amckillip said:randy said:Rather than (or in addition to) renaming the conference, how about bulking up the quality even further by showing Evansville (and one of the ISUs :-o )the door and bringing in SLU and Butler?
As much as this idea scares me I think it's a good idea, I don't know if it would ever happen, but as far as legitimizing the MVC, it would go a long way.
andypt7 said:BUSongwriter said:I've got the winner....
The Big Power Conference.
My guess is CBS and ESPN would sue, because it seems only they have the right to decide what is and isn't a power conference. But I like it!![]()
There was a lot of love down in StL for the MVC with the sold out crowds. Elgin's done a great job, but he's got a LOT of work left. I hope he's howling the next few days. Reaching the semifinals in all the other "power" conference tournaments is good enough. (Ex: Illinois). Not in ours.
Finally, the RPI can RIP. KenPom is now off my "favorites" list because RPI means nothing.
Don't Blame Pomoroy for the RPI. He only reports it. In fact, he has a blog entry from Feb stating the the RPI has lost it's usefulness, and based on the committees selections today, I wonder why we even continue to use it.
http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/2007/02/02/
peoriakid said:Maybe Memphis is getting tired of being the only big fish in the Conference USA pond. We could invite Memphis and invite Tulsa back. We could divide the conference into a North and South, (or East and West) with 6 teams per side. More or less like the big 12 or SEC. You would only play some teams from the other side once.
Ryan