Okay, let's roll it up and put it away.
KK is a great guy, and well-liked by many. but you can't assume that just because you or your buddy liked him it means he had the best vision of how to run an athletic department, or never made errors in judgment.
Likewise, is it that big of a surprise that a new boss would want his or her own people in the top positions. this was not the first VP-level departure from the university, yet this is the one that is stirring up controversy. Where were the naysayers with the previous two departures?
I'm not saying that the way this was handled was the best way possible, but don't you all think that if somebody wanted KK gone they would have just axed him a while ago, and not let him find a replacement job, first?
The bottom line is that you all can speculate but its just hearsay and conjecture. I think KK is a fantastic guy, and I wish him the best. But this vitriol towards the University because of an (internal) human resource decision seems a bit unwarranted.