How come some people have a hard time recognizing sour grapes when it's so obvious that's what this is.
In fact, this is so similar to the Danny Granger situation, I find it eerie. Recall Danny Granger claimed Jim Les called him (in the era before text messaging)
and said if he tried to leave, he'd make his life "he**". But then as the facts played out, and it became more and more
apparent that Granger was orchestrating his attack to coincide with his departure in order to deflect attention from the tampering, and that much of that stuff never happened, like the speeding ticket that caused him to be late for the team bus....all of which has been proven to be lies!
I remain convinced that the only operative in this entire scenario that's saying anything against BU or Jim Les, TCS' dad, is pulling his theatrics in order to deflect from the obvious, that TCS simply doesn't fit at the D-I level.
I basically have two opinions about this........
--one is that I will believe the BU point of view until someone else or even one shred of evidence comes forward to substantiate what TCS' dad is saying. So far his word has nothing to back it up. Tyrone himself seems quiet and is not supporting his dad, and this issue with a text message is a ridiculous claim unless he can produce the message. Hey-- even if I were very, very close to my dad, he still would never have seen my text messages or known what was in them, so come on Mr. C-S, pony up!! Let's see if you have the evidence. If not, then I don't believe you, and it sounds like you're just trying to deflect attention from the obvious, that Tyrone is better off playing at D-II and just couldn't make it at D-I. I like Tyrone, wish him well, but I see the obvious, and I know sour grapes when I see them.
--second, I wish we'd have some local press that would stop printing as fact, just about every kind of silly rumor or claim that disparages Bradley.
I am still waiting for the evidence of the Suggs-positive drug test that was supposed to exist...and now the claim of a nasty text message....let's see it. If it does exist, let's start with the evidence, but if it is just a he said/she said thing, then give it up, PJS. How many of the "surrounding himself with people who take the expedient route rather than the principled one" and "Suggs/drug test" and Granger phoney claims are we going to have to read about in a major newspaper?
Why the continuous vendetta in the press to run with anything negative, even if it's unsubstantiated and rumor?
