There should be a retraction. That headline last night was BS. Come on PJ Star - You try to build up goodwill with BU by creating 'BradleyHoops' online, and then turn around and continue to spin things negatively. Just report the d@mn facts and let people make up their own minds. I know it's a lost art but I know there are still good people working there.
There should be a retraction. That headline last night was BS. Come on PJ Star - You try to build up goodwill with BU by creating 'BradleyHoops' online, and then turn around and continue to spin things negatively. Just report the d@mn facts and let people make up their own minds. I know it's a lost art but I know there are still good people working there.
I just thought it should be bolded!
What was the headline?
I do like the PJS, one of the first sites I went to when I got a computer, they had a bunch of great Bradley Articles online this morning. The article being talked about, I guess everyone words things wrong once in a while. But it has to be pointed out to them like the posters are doing.
At the risk of getting everyone upset....why in the world is everyone overreacting? It's funny, I read the paper, see the headlines and go on.
I seriously doubt JP had any intention of RS when he came to BU. I don't know the exact time of decision but I'm guessing it was basically at the last minute.
I don't remember anyone here thinking JP was going to RS.
It seemed to surprise everyone. I'm sure he's a disappointed some but if he knows his minutes will probably be limited then he also knows it's a wise decision.
I just don't see the reason to get all upset about it.
The headline was "Feeling Sting of Redshirting", referring to Eureka Hornets' Jordan Prosser. The secondary headline that ran in the paper today was even more negative, can't remember what it said.
I just don't see the reason to get all upset about it.
per Coach Les, there were misquotes and out of context quotes in the story - not the 1st time..
Just in regards to ghunt's post above about WE at the 4...
As I recall there was a great deal of gnashing of teeth about WE playing at the 4 because he looked tentative and roamed the perimeter jacking up 3s. That contrasted with the beginning of his sophomore season when he played at the 5 and suddenly looked aggressive and confident. I think Egolf is a center and plays like one... and I'm doubting we'll see him spend much time at all at the 4. Also, the last real power forward we had was not Cellus... If that's a prototypical "4" you are a big fan of a 4-guard lineup. Cellus was 6'5 on a good day, and not a "big guy" in build. He was undersized, but more than good enough to make up for his size disadvantage. Zach Andrews or Matt Salley were our last good 4s. I think TB is going to be very good there, but he's undersized... MK could be a really nice development if he shows up as advertised.
At the risk of getting everyone upset....why in the world is everyone overreacting? It's funny, I read the paper, see the headlines and go on.
I seriously doubt JP had any intention of RS when he came to BU. I don't know the exact time of decision but I'm guessing it was basically at the last minute.
I don't remember anyone here thinking JP was going to RS.
It seemed to surprise everyone. I'm sure he's a disappointed some but if he knows his minutes will probably be limited then he also knows it's a wise decision.
I just don't see the reason to get all upset about it.
Yeah, (2) 200+ lb 6'3" guards and a 6'9" guard don't necessarily support your position there...
That would be like Bradley playing Milos at the 3 while having Andrew and DSE in running the point...
I don't if ever expect to see Jim have that lineup out...
Although I believe I did mention yesterday that it would be nice to have Anthony and Will on the floor at the same time with Will at the 4.
This whole 3 or 4 guard offense is just plain dumb. Why adhere to what everyone else is doing when you can make them matchup to you?
In reality, there should be times where AT/Will/Taylor make up the front line as both Will and Taylor can step out and knock down 16' jumpers.
Not only that, we don't exactly have more than 1 outstanding 3-pt shooter, so why play small?
You give up way too much of strength and rebounding.